You are a gmail user, I surmise. So are others. Gmail collapses cited text, so
you don't trim it. Those of us using other mail user agents then have to wade
through *pages* of cited text to find your replies, which generally only apply
to the last paragraph or two of the cited text.
Any
repeated with less quotation
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Russell Leggett russell.legg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:18 PM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Russell Leggett
russell.legg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
You are a gmail user, I surmise. So are others. Gmail collapses cited text,
so you don't trim it. Those of us using other mail user agents then have to
wade through *pages* of cited text to find your replies, which
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Mike Samuel mikesam...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/4 Russell Leggett russell.legg...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Mike Samuel mikesam...@gmail.com
wrote:
No it doesn't.
Just walk the object graph starting from the root object and let the
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Mike Samuel mikesam...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/4 Russell Leggett russell.legg...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Mike Samuel mikesam...@gmail.com
wrote:
No
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Russell Leggett
russell.legg...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Mike Samuel mikesam...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/10/4 Russell Leggett
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:52 AM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Russell Leggett russell.legg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Mike
Here again I am not sure how we ended up with this conversation but you can
find a function able to extract properties and methods out of a generic
object:
https://gist.github.com/1264775
It works with jQuery too, as well as arrays, etc etc
Regards,
Andrea Giammarchi
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Russell Leggett
russell.legg...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:52 AM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Russell Leggett
russell.legg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, John
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
Here again I am not sure how we ended up with this conversation but you can
find a function able to extract properties and methods out of a generic
object:
https://gist.github.com/1264775
It works with
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Russell Leggett
russell.legg...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
Here again I am not sure how we ended up with this conversation but you
can
find a function able to extract properties and
with such dynamic language I would never trust much AST
This is for realtime, inline, methods and properties suggestion and it's
kinda fast as macro/inspector
I don't know where the thread is going either :-)
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Russell Leggett
russell.legg...@gmail.comwrote:
On
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:49 AM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Russell Leggett russell.legg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:52 AM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Russell
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
with such dynamic language I would never trust much AST
This is for realtime, inline, methods and properties suggestion and it's
kinda fast as macro/inspector
I don't know where the thread is going either :-)
Sorry Russ, I am not sure I got it
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Russell Leggett
russell.legg...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
with such dynamic language I would never trust much AST
This is for realtime, inline,
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Russell Leggett
russell.legg...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:49 AM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Russell Leggett
russell.legg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:52 AM, John
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:18 PM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Russell Leggett russell.legg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:49 AM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Russell
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Russell Leggett
russell.legg...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:18 PM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Russell Leggett
russell.legg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:49 AM, John J
Le 03/10/2011 22:49, Andrea Giammarchi a écrit :
Dear All,
while I had the opportunity to ask directly to Brendan Eich this
question, I would like to ask you 5 minutes of your precious time to
understand common concerns from the JS community, summarized under my
point of view in this
David, as I have tweeted before, syntax is a non problem, surely is not a
problem *now* because you already have alternatives such CoffeeScript, GWT,
Traceeur or any sort of transpiler you want ... do all these new syntax
bring real benefits to JavaScript ?
I am not sure, I never needed new
2011/10/4 David Bruant david.bru...@labri.fr:
Le 03/10/2011 22:49, Andrea Giammarchi a écrit :
Dear All,
while I had the opportunity to ask directly to Brendan Eich this
question, I would like to ask you 5 minutes of your precious time to
understand common concerns from the JS community,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Mike Samuel mikesam...@gmail.com wrote:
No it doesn't.
Just walk the object graph starting from the root object and let the
set of all reachable symbols be A.
Load jQuery
Walk the object graph again letting the set of all reachable symbols be B.
The public
2011/10/4 Russell Leggett russell.legg...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Mike Samuel mikesam...@gmail.com wrote:
No it doesn't.
Just walk the object graph starting from the root object and let the
set of all reachable symbols be A.
Load jQuery
Walk the object graph again
23 matches
Mail list logo
