Nice.
I wonder what Horse would think of Vermin Supreme's pony identification program.
But in all seriousness, Google, MSFT, are all pushing for IoT or
wearables by putting on events featuring that, creating a buzz, and
making press on the event.
On 6/23/14, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.org
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Nice.
I wonder what Horse would think of Vermin Supreme's pony identification
program.
But in all seriousness, Google, MSFT, are all pushing for IoT or
wearables by putting on events featuring that, creating a
On 6/23/14, joe joe...@gmail.com wrote:
And here I thought you were making an educated argument with your
explanation of the history of propaganda and public relations. When I
first read corporate propaganda, I thought you mean the propaganda of JS
developers, not commercial corporations.
And here I thought you were making an educated argument with your
explanation of the history of propaganda and public relations. When I
first read corporate propaganda, I thought you mean the propaganda of JS
developers, not commercial corporations.
Frankly, I find the idea that commercial
+1
But Garrett's post was helpful in its own way. @horse_esdiscuss agrees!
/be
joe wrote:
And here I thought you were making an educated argument with your
explanation of the history of propaganda and public relations. When I
first read corporate propaganda, I thought you mean the
On 6/20/14, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm not quite sure what this is all about, so forking in hope for
clarifications.
I'm sorry to send a message that will probably be read as noise by a lot
of people, but I'm also tired of some of these pointless and
unconstructive, if
Hi,
I'm not quite sure what this is all about, so forking in hope for
clarifications.
I'm sorry to send a message that will probably be read as noise by a lot
of people, but I'm also tired of some of these pointless and
unconstructive, if not destructive, fights among people (in here, on
Can you develop these particular accusations?
Why would TC39 have priorities that don't align with the needs of developers?
especially on modules which are clearly one of the most awaited feature as
far as developers are concerned?
TC39 has a lot of constituents who use their experience
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Domenic Denicola
dome...@domenicdenicola.com wrote:
Can you develop these particular accusations?
Why would TC39 have priorities that don't align with the needs of
developers? especially on modules which are clearly one of the most awaited
feature as far as
I'll make this point as concisely as possible, since this conversation is
quite given to noise:
While others may disagree, I feel the source of contention/disunity on
modules is more fundamental than syntax or who's (not) listening to who.
Specifically, ES6 modules are far less immune to
On Jun 20, 2014 11:39 AM, John Barton johnjbar...@google.com wrote:
I started out with a similar opinion. Then I wrote some ES6 code.
What we need now is experience from using ES6-modules. We have plenty
of decent implementations. We've built nodejs and browser applications
based on ES6
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:39 AM, John Barton johnjbar...@google.com
wrote:
I started out with a similar opinion. Then I wrote some ES6 code.
What we need now is experience from using ES6-modules. We have plenty of
decent implementations. We've built nodejs and browser applications based
on
A minimal, pragmatic and well integrated solution is the ES6 Module Transpiler:
https://github.com/square/es6-module-transpiler
Additionally, Addy Osmani maintains a comprehensive list of tools:
https://github.com/addyosmani/es6-tools
Axel
On Jun 20, 2014, at 19:54 , Jasper St. Pierre
I am trying to stay outside this discussion as much as I can but there is a
specific sentence that I'd like to understand:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:39 AM, John Barton johnjbar...@google.com wrote:
The ES5-module using community tried, valiantly, to reach a compromise
module solution. They
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to stay outside this discussion as much as I can but there is
a specific sentence that I'd like to understand:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:39 AM, John Barton johnjbar...@google.com
wrote:
The
I think tools made `require` the winning choice but about having both I am
not sure I've read about dynamic folder such:
`import _ from loDashFolder`
if that's a thing then
```
var require = function (fromWhere) {
return import _ from loDashFolder
};
```
or whatever will be
Best Regards
typo ...
```
var require = function (fromWhere) {
return import * from fromWhere
};
```
or something similar
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
I think tools made `require` the winning choice but about having both I am
not sure I've
On Friday, June 20, 2014 7:15 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
typo ...
```
var require = function (fromWhere) {
return import * from fromWhere
};
```
That's not valid ES6. It's specified that:
- Import and export statements can only be top level statements
-
18 matches
Mail list logo
