Re: Re: Add "???" Unimplemented

const ɁɁɁ = () => { throw new Error('Method not defined'); }; Thomas Grainger On 26 March 2018 at 06:26, Isiah Meadows wrote: > Even in TypeScript, `never` (the type of functions that never return - > throwing ≠ returning) is the subtype of *all* types, even primitives. > - > > Isiah Meadow

Re: Import from project root

`global.rootRequire` is quite bad (like user-added globals in general), I'd just do that https://gist.github.com/branneman/8048520#gistcomment-2247189, or use lerna, or use webpack resolvers 2018-03-29 17:37 GMT+02:00 T.J. Crowder : > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Sebastian Malton > wrote: >

Re: Re: Add "???" Unimplemented

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Thomas Grainger wrote: > > const ɁɁɁ = () => { throw new Error('Method not defined'); }; LOL. Awkward to type on most keyboards, though. :-) Suppose one could use some form of auto-correct in one's IDE... -- T.J. Crowder ___

Re: How many ES5 environments are still in use today?

We still use ES5 for development, since our server-side platform (GPSEE) doesn't run on later SpiderMonkey (embedding API made massive changes a couple of years ago and we haven't had resources to update.massive changes) I am working closely with another company right now that uses NodeJS. It

from './foo' import './foo';

Could ```js from 'name' import something; ``` be added to ES module grammar? which would work like the current ```js import something from 'name'; ``` The advantage is to sort more easily import, and have autocompletion of imported identifiers ___ es-d

Re: from './foo' import './foo';

Personally I like this syntax better, but feel that changing or adding import syntax at this point I'd a non-starter... Not sure what others feel about this one. On Wed, Apr 4, 2018, 09:23 Cyril Auburtin wrote: > Could > ```js > from 'name' import something; > ``` > > be added to ES module gram