Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces?

On 12/03/2008, Boris Zbarsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess I could do the two interfaces, but I'm having a hard time seeing different extensions being made to these two interfaces (as opposed to wholly new interfaces being invented, as was done here). I can actually imagine one extension

Re: [selectors-api] Why have two identical differently named interfaces?

Oops, don't know how I ended up sending that to this mailing list - it was intended for the WebAPI WG list... -- David liorean Andersson ___ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss

Re: ES4 draft last call: line continuation in string and regexliterals

Jeff Dyer wrote: Waldemar, can you suggest a fix? The correct fix is to add the relevant productions to the lexer grammar. It's fairly straightforward in the string literal grammar. It's painful in the regexp grammar. Waldemar ___ Es4-discuss

Re: eval

Lars Hansen wrote: In my opinion the following is roughly right: obj.eval(x) if eval is the original global eval function then if obj is an ES global object (window, frame) then invoke eval as follows: the scope chain holds that window (global) object only the