Yes, yes and yes. Maybe. ;-)
I very much like the idea of having an elegant event-handling framework at the
heart of ESME. However, it is also critically important that what we deliver to
users does not require them to understand this.
By analogy: Access is based on SQL and the whole
David,
Holy tortoise, what have I started? Seriously, this is very
interesting because ESME's focus for a while has been on interactions
where one endpoint is not necessarily a human, and in processing these
interactions. The formula of events and rules for processing them
provides ultimate power
Thanks Andy, this looks like an efficient use of an external library.
I just heard of stevej's library because it's used in Jonas Boner's
new Akka actors library. I need to take a look into scala-stats and
see what else we can use from this library.
Incidentally, I'm also writing an actor for
Darren,
I fully agree with you. I have no plans to make ESME harder to use. At its
core, it's a micro-messaging system. On the other hand, I do want to make
it easier for people who are not Scala developers with access to the ESME
source code to build applications on top of ESME. I view this
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Vassil Dichev vdic...@apache.org wrote:
Darren,
I fully agree with you. I have no plans to make ESME harder to use. At
its
core, it's a micro-messaging system. On the other hand, I do want to
make
it easier for people who are not Scala developers with
Hi Vassil,
If you look at the scala-stats library, you need to look at my fork of it on
my git-hub account (http://github.com/andythedestroyer). I added some more
stats and JMX functionality that ESME is using. I provided a link note in
the pom section of the patch file. I am in contact with
