Re: [Eug-lug]Re: TiVo series 2

2003-02-07 Thread Bob Crandell
Sorry. Want an aspirin? Beaker (aka Jeff W) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*: > >Bob Crandell wrote: >> And what do you have to offer as proof that your critical thinking skills are still >> good? > >Ouch! > >___ >Eug-LUG mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http

[Eug-lug]Re: nobody's shell

2003-02-07 Thread Beaker (aka Jeff W)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 |>1) Talking about nobody -- what should be his/her shell ? |> My distro decided on /bin/sh whereas some system accounts are assigned | | I think it depends on what nobody's doing by default, or what you do and | don't want nobody to be able to do (ea

Re: nobody's shell // was Re: [Eug-lug]mail to root under postfix ?

2003-02-07 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:43:59AM -0800, Horst wrote: > 1) Talking about nobody -- what should be his/her shell ? > My distro decided on /bin/sh whereas some system accounts are assigned > to /bin/false (or true), neither giving them much power. > I guess I could try and wait until some applica

Re: nobody's shell // was Re: [Eug-lug]mail to root under postfix?

2003-02-07 Thread Horst
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Bob Miller wrote: ... > > /bin/false is good. /bin/sh is less good. *maybe*, due to an error Thanks, Bob ! .. > > I'm surprised that there's no entry in /etc/shadow. md5 passwords are KDE User Manager did that (no entry in shadow) -I just confirmed one more time. ==> I'll

[Eug-lug]Re: TiVo series 2

2003-02-07 Thread Ben Huot
I'm proof - I watch more TV than anyone I know. From 4-6 hours a day at least and I am more critical than anyone I have ever met. I don't believe anything CNN or the Royal Bush family tells me. The real information is buried in the tabloids. Beaker (aka Jeff W) wrote: Bob Crandell wrote: And

Re: nobody's shell // was Re: [Eug-lug]mail to root under postfix ?

2003-02-07 Thread Bob Miller
Horst wrote: > 1) Talking about nobody -- what should be his/her shell ? > My distro decided on /bin/sh whereas some system accounts are assigned > to /bin/false (or true), neither giving them much power. > I guess I could try and wait until some application using nobody > breaks... but maybe y

nobody's shell // was Re: [Eug-lug]mail to root under postfix ?

2003-02-07 Thread Horst
1) Talking about nobody -- what should be his/her shell ? My distro decided on /bin/sh whereas some system accounts are assigned to /bin/false (or true), neither giving them much power. I guess I could try and wait until some application using nobody breaks... but maybe you folks wanna spoil tha

Re: [Eug-lug]Re: TiVo series 2

2003-02-07 Thread Beaker (aka Jeff W)
Bob Crandell wrote: And what do you have to offer as proof that your critical thinking skills are still good? Ouch! ___ Eug-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug

Re: [Eug-lug]error compiling in Gentoo

2003-02-07 Thread Bob Miller
Neil Parker wrote: > More serious explanation: Obviously you're trying to compile a C++ program. > C++ isn't my main programming language, so I'm not very familiar with its > evolution, but it HAS evolved in the not-too-distant past, and part of that > evolution has been changes in the standard h

Re: [Eug-lug]SuSE

2003-02-07 Thread Dave Wyatt
Hi Jamie, I haven't re-compiled the kernel and to my knowledge, I haven't updated the kernel with any update patches. If there was an update to the kernel it would have been from SuSE and I would think it would not break any functionality -- but that is always possible with changes and updates.