[For some reason, this just tickled my funny bone. Somehow I doubt that
congress has officially endorsed Personal Firewall Day, so I don't think
schools and post offices will be closing in honor of the event... --Hal]
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: January 15
Actually, for this to work for what I wanted it to do, the 'if' statement needs to be:
if [ $testvar -eq 1 ]; then
This adds text to the file only if it isn't already there.
Thanks guys.
Garl Grigsby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
With many tasks, it's better to do positive validation
(i.e.
- Forwarded message from Marsee Henon [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Marsee Henon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:06:06 -0800
Subject: Newsletter from O'Reilly UG Program, January 14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
O'Reilly
Hal Pomeranz wrote:
Several people requested the slides from the talk I gave up in Corvallis
last night.
I'd like to hear more about your co-lo experience. I'm a little
surprised you don't have physical access to your box there. What did
you say your bandwidth cap is?
I'm also curious how
Aggh, you've just sparked an old suppressed memory.
I had to build this huge BIND install and hardening
script one time. I created a function for just about
every task in the script and used a function like that
to check return values. In each of the task functions,
I'd set a variable for
Hi,
This is for you guys that tried to help at a clinic recently. qmail is working.
The problem was mostly typos. Did you know that if there is a space after a
back-slash, it won't go to the next line like you're expecting? That was a hard
lesson.
The word 'any' has a 'y' at the end. Sigh.
Jason wrote:
Aggh, you've just sparked an old suppressed memory.
I had to build this huge BIND install and hardening
script one time. I created a function for just about
every task in the script and used a function like that
to check return values. In each of the task functions,
I'd set a
The trouble is, I just barely have a grasp on shell programming and I can only spell
piethon.
Jason ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Aggh, you've just sparked an old suppressed memory.
I had to build this huge BIND install and hardening
script one time. I created a function for just about
every task
I'd like to hear more about your co-lo experience. I'm a little
surprised you don't have physical access to your box there. What did
you say your bandwidth cap is?
Actually, the co-lo I ended up choosing (the IP Services data center
near Coburg/Beltline) does permit me to get physical access
That's pi-thon:
3.
1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510
5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679
8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128
4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196
4428810975 6659334461 2847564823 3786783165 2712019091
Show off.
Ralph Zeller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
That's pi-thon:
3.
1415926535 8979323846 2643383279 5028841971 6939937510
5820974944 5923078164 0628620899 8628034825 3421170679
8214808651 3282306647 0938446095 5058223172 5359408128
4811174502 8410270193 8521105559 6446229489 5493038196
Massachusetts has moved away from their OSS-preferential stance:
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/14/212242mode=thread
links in the article summary:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1436258,00.asp
(backing down)
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/19/2114233
(previous
Did this take over two hours from the posting time until it came through to
others' mailboxen? sheesh... I'm such a whiner!
Ben (writing this at around 3:20)
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:14:52 -0800
Some Idjit wrote:
| Massachusetts has moved away from their OSS-preferential stance:
|
|
$300 for a new (not refurb, AFAICT) one is a good deal:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B88EDE/102-7022357-8443330
(shipping is free)
found via dealnews.com
NOT AN ADVERT, just interesting linux-related hadrware market updates.
flame on if you must = )
Ben
PS - too bad
Hi,
I'm looking at someone else's code:
DD=`id $QS_USER 2/dev/null`
if [ $? -ne 0 -o $DD = ]; then
catEOF
This is supposed to check to see if a user exists (it does) then moves on. In this
case, it says said user doesn't and exits. I don't get it. Why is it lying to me
like that?
Bob Crandell wrote:
if [ $? -ne 0 -o $DD = ]; then
Should be...
if [ $? -ne 0 -o $DD == ]; then
--
Bob Miller Kbob
kbobsoft software consulting
http://kbobsoft.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
EuG-LUG
I am appending O'Reilly's call for papers for next years conference.
And of course PLUG is talking with O'Reilly about other ways of
helping - like we did last year.
Sincerely,
David Mandel
I'm forwarding the following note from Marsee Henon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about the 2004 O'Reilly Open Source Convention and a survey they
would like people to complete.
We really want to continue to have a major Open Source Conference
in Portland, and O'Reilly treated us very good last year.
So,
Bob Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Bob Crandell wrote:
if [ $? -ne 0 -o $DD = ]; then
Should be...
if [ $? -ne 0 -o $DD == ]; then
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
if [ $? -ne 0 -o $DD = ]; then
Should be...
if [ $? -ne 1 -o $DD == ]; then
Thanks
19 matches
Mail list logo
