Quoth Max Lemieux, on Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:06:16 -0800:
~/.bashrc
~/.bash_profile
There is also a global file on most installations: /etc/bashrc, in case
you want to change the shell for all users.
--Jason Van Cleve
--
In 2010, Microsoft Windows will be a quantum processing emulation layer
Many have /etc/profile as well, not to be missed if it is there.
Ben
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:24:40 -0800
Jason Van Cleve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Quoth Max Lemieux, on Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:06:16 -0800:
|
| ~/.bashrc
| ~/.bash_profile
|
| There is also a global file on most installations:
Thanks for the tip on Graybar, Norvac can be a mixed bag: hard to find
items, but pricey.
I shopped at a few places not worth mentioning... and I did buy from Stan
while the PC training center was the ELUG hangout.
I used to use VOC: they are price competitive, but I found the owner (lead
tech?)
So, if I ssh into a system and have X-forwarding for the session, anything
including my initial [bash or other] shell could be logging my local
keystrokes, even in other windows? (assuming the shell binay was modified
to log such events)
They can only get X events, though, so they don't get
Happy Friday all:
Are there many FreeBSD users on the list? I had
experience with FreeBSD many moons ago, and have
pretty much only dealt whith Open on the BSD side of
things for the last 3 or 4 years (and OS X for the
last year or so).
Having read through the recent BSD vs. Linux or BSD
for
Yeah, I don't swing that way either.
Yeah, I don't swing that way, either, but that has nothing to do with
this list or the bash shell. More specifically, I don't bash those who
do swing that way
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:57:53 -0800
Max wrote:
| And here I thought you were referring
So, if I ssh into a system and have X-forwarding for the session, anything
including my initial [bash or other] shell could be logging my local
keystrokes, even in other windows? (assuming the shell binay was modified
to log such events)
Remember that if you log into a remote system, your
Right on. I'm looking at the Nemeniah MII's that just came out, but your
statements confirm my latest thoughts that the Via mobo will be more of a
plaything, to test out its capabilities and the feasibility of it as a media
PC... I'm leaning toward the SS51G or an XPC system (either with a P4) as
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:16:56AM -0800, Jason wrote:
Happy Friday all:
Are there many FreeBSD users on the list? I had
experience with FreeBSD many moons ago, and have
pretty much only dealt whith Open on the BSD side of
things for the last 3 or 4 years (and OS X for the
last year or
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:40:50PM -0800, Ben Barrett wrote:
Can also suggest Graybar for cables and networking tools (ends/crimpers,
etc), although they claim to be wholesalers, I think they'd happily take
your money. I've found them to be more helpful and also cheaper on a lot of
things,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:02:06PM -0800, Bob Miller wrote:
Video comes in many formats. I doubt a VIA CPU can handle realtime
decompression of most of those formats. And future codecs will be
more compute intensive. If you're building a single-purpose box that
only uses MPEG compression,
I've been using NetBSD for about 3 years, mostly on Sparc. It's
been by primary desktop (sparc 5, 170MHz) for about the last 18
months and for the most part I'm pretty content with it. By sticking
with lightweight apps (both command-line and GUI) I've found I can
get by just fine with what is
Hal Pomeranz wrote:
The normal X remote protocol has
all of the authentication problems described above PLUS it happens in
clear text on the network, which means you can watch the network from
some other system with something like Der Mouse's X Connection
Monitor and passively sniff
The normal X remote protocol has
all of the authentication problems described above PLUS it happens in
clear text on the network, which means you can watch the network from
some other system with something like Der Mouse's X Connection
Monitor and passively sniff everything that's going
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:25:46PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using NetBSD for about 3 years, mostly on Sparc. It's
been by primary desktop (sparc 5, 170MHz) for about the last 18
months and for the most part I'm pretty content with it. By sticking
with lightweight apps (both
It goes a little like this. As a shop we limit ourselves to a
certain number of vendors otherwise they all call begging for
more business. So if our few vendors don't have an older part
such as P3 boards (though we can often still get Tyan dual CPU
boards) then we encourage the buyer to check
http://www.wweek.com/story.php?story=4764
___
EuG-LUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug
17 matches
Mail list logo
