Re: [eug-lug]Store and Forward

2004-03-10 Thread Cory Petkovsek
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:02:39PM +, Bob Crandell wrote: Hi, One of my clients is asking for a SPAM filter for his Exchange server. No wise cracks. He's stuck and he knows it. What I was planning on putting in was Sendmail/Procmail/SpamAssassin store and forward mail server. My

Re: [eug-lug]Store and Forward

2004-03-10 Thread Christopher Forsythe
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:02:39PM +, Bob Crandell wrote: LDAP is built in to exchange. Cory Not totally correct. Active directory is based on ldap, and exchange 2000 is dependent on active directory. Exchange is also an active directory aware system. Now if this person were to be using

Re: [eug-lug]Store and Forward

2004-03-10 Thread Bob Crandell
Cory Petkovsek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:02:39PM +, Bob Crandell wrote: Hi, One of my clients is asking for a SPAM filter for his Exchange server. No wise cracks. He's stuck and he knows it. What I was planning on putting in was

Re: [eug-lug]Store and Forward

2004-03-10 Thread Jason
Maybe a dumb question, but why does the customer want a separate box vs. installing something like netiq's mailmarshal right on the Exchange box? Is the Exchange box the mx? (I hope not) Is this solution being planned for the mx? This is what I'd tend to recommend (anti-spam on either the mx or

Re: [eug-lug]Store and Forward

2004-03-10 Thread Ken Barber
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:02:39PM +, Bob Crandell wrote: Hi, One of my clients is asking for a SPAM filter for his Exchange server. No wise cracks. He's stuck and he knows it. What I was planning on putting in was Sendmail/Procmail/SpamAssassin store and forward mail

Re: [eug-lug]Store and Forward

2004-03-10 Thread Bob Crandell
I'm wanting a stand alone box more than he is. The Exchange server is SBS 2000 and is barely keeping up. My goal is to use them as a test bed to build a generic box that I can clone and plug into anybody's site and have it just work. The Exchange box is the mx. The spam filter is to become the

Re: [eug-lug]Store and Forward

2004-03-10 Thread Jason
Ah, SBS and Exchange is the mx. Zoinks! or, alternately, Yikes! Good plan for the spam/mx box; keep us posted (sorry I don't have any other assistance). J --- Bob Crandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm wanting a stand alone box more than he is. The Exchange server is SBS 2000 and is barely

[eug-lug]second NIC for dedicated connection

2004-03-10 Thread Mr O
I've added a second NIC to my fileserver and gamebox for dedicated connections. I can SSH into the fileserver over the dedicated connection but I can't connect via samba or NFS. I've already changed my /etc/hosts, hosts.allow, smb.conf, and exports files. Am I missing something else? Should I

Re: [eug-lug]second NIC for dedicated connection

2004-03-10 Thread John Sechrest
Any chance you have ipchains or IPtables running? Mr O [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: % I've added a second NIC to my fileserver and gamebox for % dedicated connections. I can SSH into the fileserver over the % dedicated connection but I can't connect via samba or NFS. I've % already changed

Re: [eug-lug]Store and Forward

2004-03-10 Thread Cory Petkovsek
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:49:57AM -0600, Christopher Forsythe wrote: On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:02:39PM +, Bob Crandell wrote: LDAP is built in to exchange. Cory Not totally correct. Active directory is based on ldap, and exchange 2000 is dependent on active directory. Exchange is

Re: [eug-lug]Store and Forward

2004-03-10 Thread Cory Petkovsek
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:48:20AM -0800, Jason wrote: Maybe a dumb question, but why does the customer want a separate box vs. installing something like netiq's mailmarshal right on the Exchange box? The customer probably wants a solution, not necessarily a separate box. How much does

Re: [eug-lug]second NIC for dedicated connection

2004-03-10 Thread Cory Petkovsek
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:09:27PM -0800, Mr O wrote: I've added a second NIC to my fileserver and gamebox for dedicated connections. I can SSH into the fileserver over the dedicated connection but I can't connect via samba or NFS. I've already changed my /etc/hosts, hosts.allow, smb.conf, and

Re: [eug-lug]Store and Forward

2004-03-10 Thread Cory Petkovsek
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 06:54:02PM +, Bob Crandell wrote: Hi, I don't have LDAP installed anywhere. So what you're saying is I need to install the users on the spam filter box in order for it to filter the mail that passes through it? Not a big deal but I was hoping against it.

Re: [eug-lug]second NIC for dedicated connection

2004-03-10 Thread Larry Price
route -an fs:ifconfig -a gbox:ifconfig -a list routes on both boxes are you sure that ssh is in fact going over the dedicated connection? On Wednesday, March 10, 2004, at 09:09 PM, Mr O wrote: I've added a second NIC to my fileserver and gamebox for dedicated connections. I can SSH into