Well said!! Thank you, Ken.
ciao,
Ben B
PS - my early linux experiences were similar: I used the twenty-some
slackware floppies, and couldn't get X going... in '94. Used OS/2 v2
(pre-warp) back then and didn't realize how 'nix-based it was. REXX,
also, which I still see around (check
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:43:21AM -0700, Ken Barber wrote:
When you get into a religious war over distros, remember that ALL
of Linux is looked down upon by the BSD folks. So be careful.
With an attitude like that, what do you expect? Be careful of
what you manifest.
I haven't seen Red
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 11:13 pm, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:43:21AM -0700, Ken Barber wrote:
When you get into a religious war over distros, remember that ALL
of Linux is looked down upon by the BSD folks. So be careful.
With an attitude like that, what do you expect?
Kent Loobey wrote:
Maybe I was just dreaming once, but I think I remember some kind
of changes RedHat made to gcc that caused binary imcompatabilities
with other Linux distros.
Yep. you are dreaming. The problem was that they implemented a version of
gcc ahead of it's time. It
I agree we should not be talking politics in this forum (it's all rigged
anyways.)
Preface: I read yesterday that AOL is partnering with M$ to settle the
browser lawsuit. I suspect Mozilla will be toast in a few months. So I'm
angry and want to get away from M$ as soon as possible.
So here I
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 01:33:05PM -0700, BAGGAB wrote:
Preface: I read yesterday that AOL is partnering with M$ to settle the
browser lawsuit. I suspect Mozilla will be toast in a few months. So I'm
angry and want to get away from M$ as soon as possible.
So here I am, a Linux newbie with a
Brian,
First off... dont appologize for being a bonehead! Asking for help is some
level of evidence that your not a complete bonehead!
I dont have answers to your redhat questions, however I can strongly suggest
using any other linux distro. Many newbies have lots of success with
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Cory Petkovsek
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 2:21 PM
To: The Eugene Unix and GNU/Linux User Group's mail list
Subject: Re: [eug-lug]OK, Ken I'll take that challenge
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 01:33:05PM -0700
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Patrick R. Wade
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:48 PM
To: The Eugene Unix and GNU/Linux User Group's mail list
Subject: Re: [eug-lug]OK, Ken I'll take that challenge
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 01:33:05PM -0700, BAGGAB wrote:
Preface: I read
On Monday 02 June 2003 10:33 pm, BAGGAB wrote:
I agree we should not be talking politics in this forum (it's all rigged
anyways.)
Preface: I read yesterday that AOL is partnering with M$ to settle the
browser lawsuit. I suspect Mozilla will be toast in a few months. So I'm
angry and want
a dialup
here?
I use dialup.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Patrick R. Wade
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:48 PM
To: The Eugene Unix and GNU/Linux User Group's mail list
Subject: Re: [eug-lug]OK, Ken I'll take that challenge
BAGGAB wrote:
Mozilla's development is really driven by the 100 or so full time
programmers at Mozilla who get their paycheck from AOL. I don't want to
slight the many other programmers who make contributions and the users who
help debug it, but its the full timers who drive the bus. I feel
Kent
Are you using RH 8.0?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Kent Loobey
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 6:31 AM
To: The Eugene Unix and GNU/Linux User Group's mail list
Subject: Re: [eug-lug]OK, Ken I'll take that challenge
On Tuesday 03
-lug]OK, Ken I'll take that challenge
BAGGAB wrote:
Mozilla's development is really driven by the 100 or so full time
programmers at Mozilla who get their paycheck from AOL. I don't want to
slight the many other programmers who make contributions and the users who
help debug it, but its
/Linux User Group's mail list
Subject: Re: [eug-lug]OK, Ken I'll take that challenge
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 12:27 am, BAGGAB wrote:
Thanks Patrick
I'm feeling a little better about it.
How come I haven't had to do this in RH 6.1 or 7.2? I know there are
distribution changes
15 matches
Mail list logo
