Yet another reason to not use RedScat.
so... do you think att is optimized for win98? maybe they trhottle base on
uname -r ?
Jamie
On Tuesday 17 December 2002 09:57 pm, Horst wrote:
: Recently I installed RH 8.0 from the demo CDs and noticed very slow
: download rates over cable (for
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Horst wrote:
Any hints? --for either cure or diagnostic ? (I am willing to dig through
long logs of ngrep or ethereal *if* needed)
Wild stabs:
What kind of ethernet card are you using? What does ifconfig have to say
about your nic? Any RX/TX errors or drops?
Have you
No, I don't think it's Red Hat specific (as far as 'thinking' can go if
you are clueless). As I indicated, with other earlier distros I
experienced things similar to some extend, but w/o ever documenting
transfer rates.
Can you expand on what maybe they trhottle base on uname -r ? means ?
-
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Po Petz wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Horst wrote:
Any hints? --for either cure or diagnostic ? (I am willing to dig through
long logs of ngrep or ethereal *if* needed)
Wild stabs:
What kind of ethernet card are you using? What does ifconfig have to say
about
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:14:09AM -0800, Horst wrote:
... kernel: http://www.scyld.com/network/ne2k-pci.html
Did you read that?
... kernel: AMD756: dev 10ec:8029, router pirq : 4 get irq : 10
... kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 10 for device 00:0c.0
... kernel: PCI: Sharing IRQ 10 with 00:07.4
How about recompiling your kernel to get rid of any
extra crud RH tends to add to the system. Aren't
kernel compiles the answer to all of life's questions?
:) Otherwise if the card is not onboard, try a
different slot.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:14:09AM -0800, Horst wrote:
... kernel: http://www.scyld.com/network/ne2k-pci.html
Did you read that?
Now I did.
Wow, if even the *author* of the kernel module says the following I may
have to go NIC shopping: PCI
Here's somebody on the web who had a very similar problem, with a
similar solution.
http://msgs.securepoint.com/cgi-bin/get/netfilter-0211/37/1.html
I wonder if your cable modem is using a larger MTU than ethernet has,
and is repacketizing your TCP stream along the way. That would allow
it to
Well... I didnt say it was RedScat specific. I simply said Yet another reason
to not use RedScat. There are many other reasons I dont use it, or support
it. Hopefully w/in a month, Ill be able to do my own testing with
Broadband...
What I was trying to elude to with the uname -r tells
