Yet another reason to not use RedScat.
so... do you think att is optimized for win98? maybe they trhottle base on
uname -r ?
Jamie
On Tuesday 17 December 2002 09:57 pm, Horst wrote:
: Recently I installed RH 8.0 from the demo CDs and noticed very slow
: download rates over cable (for
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Horst wrote:
Any hints? --for either cure or diagnostic ? (I am willing to dig through
long logs of ngrep or ethereal *if* needed)
Wild stabs:
What kind of ethernet card are you using? What does ifconfig have to say
about your nic? Any RX/TX errors or drops?
Have you
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:18:32PM -0800, Bob Miller wrote:
I'm really disappointed I can't go to this one.
Same - I'm very interested in somewhat unorthodox PDAs .. =)
--
Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sanity is counterproductive
Z.O.I.D.: Zombie Optimized for Infiltration
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 03:31:24PM -0800, Patrick R. Wade wrote:
Are we having a meeting on Dec 26th to show off our new toys?
If I am back in town then, I will be there. =) I do not know for certain
that I will be though.
--
Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] This thing
(origianlly I was going to post a link to this on activism... but then I
though... hey eug-lug is archived on the web... Ill just post the whole
thing!
Many of you have already read this probably... I think I may have too... I
watched this movie (DVD's are soo cool!) about 3 guys that are
Sigh... I just got this one... Presumably its just a way to get web traffic...
(I intentionally left out the email address it came from...)
but there was no message, just a subject line, and an email address it came
from... just think about how many poor shlumps that got all excited and
thought
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 01:35:54AM -0800, Linux Rocks ! wrote:
Many of you have already read this probably...
Yeah, but it's hard to argue against such well intentioned, 'simple'
advice :)
Thanks for the reminder(s).
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
No, I don't think it's Red Hat specific (as far as 'thinking' can go if
you are clueless). As I indicated, with other earlier distros I
experienced things similar to some extend, but w/o ever documenting
transfer rates.
Can you expand on what maybe they trhottle base on uname -r ? means ?
-
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Po Petz wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Horst wrote:
Any hints? --for either cure or diagnostic ? (I am willing to dig through
long logs of ngrep or ethereal *if* needed)
Wild stabs:
What kind of ethernet card are you using? What does ifconfig have to say
about
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:14:09AM -0800, Horst wrote:
... kernel: http://www.scyld.com/network/ne2k-pci.html
Did you read that?
... kernel: AMD756: dev 10ec:8029, router pirq : 4 get irq : 10
... kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 10 for device 00:0c.0
... kernel: PCI: Sharing IRQ 10 with 00:07.4
That whole 'spoken song' had air time a few years back
on the local radio stations in AZ. I'm sure others
have heard it too. Another point though is; who the
heck needs sunscreen in Eugene?! Most days there is
not a sky in the cloud.
__
Do you
You still need sunscreen to protect yourself from sunny personalities.
Mike O ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
That whole 'spoken song' had air time a few years back
on the local radio stations in AZ. I'm sure others
have heard it too. Another point though is; who the
heck needs sunscreen in Eugene?!
How about recompiling your kernel to get rid of any
extra crud RH tends to add to the system. Aren't
kernel compiles the answer to all of life's questions?
:) Otherwise if the card is not onboard, try a
different slot.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 03:14:09AM -0800, Horst wrote:
... kernel: http://www.scyld.com/network/ne2k-pci.html
Did you read that?
Now I did.
Wow, if even the *author* of the kernel module says the following I may
have to go NIC shopping: PCI
Mike O wrote:
Somebody buying you new toys? I can hardly afford to
get myself anything cool right now.
You don't have to get yourself anything. You just have to let your
adoring fans know what you'd like.
--
Bob Miller Kbob
kbobsoft software consulting
Here's somebody on the web who had a very similar problem, with a
similar solution.
http://msgs.securepoint.com/cgi-bin/get/netfilter-0211/37/1.html
I wonder if your cable modem is using a larger MTU than ethernet has,
and is repacketizing your TCP stream along the way. That would allow
it to
Well... I didnt say it was RedScat specific. I simply said Yet another reason
to not use RedScat. There are many other reasons I dont use it, or support
it. Hopefully w/in a month, Ill be able to do my own testing with
Broadband...
What I was trying to elude to with the uname -r tells
M MW WV VL U U GGG
MM MMW WV VL U UG
M M MW W W V V L U UG GG
M M W W W V V L U UG G
M M W
Thanks Bob, interesting link suggestion, but it came too late -- I read
your message on Mike's computer at Mike's store, and left with an Intel
PRO/100 S NIC.
Now this is so cool - the JPGs in Mozilla pop up like they would be in
cache (but they aren't), and scp is twice(!) as fast as what I had
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,768073,00.asp
ciao gang, enjoy!
b
PS - I had some mail problems, am not getting euglug list emails
anymore, but I checked my sub and it seems okay... anyone, help?
--
Ben Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
counterclaim
Around Wed,Dec 18 2002, at 04:51, Horst, wrote:
Thanks Bob, interesting link suggestion, but it came too late -- I read
your message on Mike's computer at Mike's store, and left with an Intel
PRO/100 S NIC.
Does MTU mean mess(age) transfer unit ?
Hhm, though largely acadimic now, if
Just in case I have any fans here...
I'd like a Creative Muvo (128MB) mp3 player, a SliMp3,
a borg teddy bear, and XP2600 CPU, Innovatek water
cooling kit, 40 LCD projection TV, and an ATI AIW
9700 PRO. Guess that'll do me fine. Oh, I've been a
good boy this year too. :)
--- Bob Miller [EMAIL
I havnt seen any errors reported by by mailman... The list is archived on the
web, so you could look there. I cant check EFN's mail log, but you could
probably check counterclaims mail log. got any mail filtering going on?
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 05:02 pm, Ben Barrett wrote:
:
23 matches
Mail list logo
