Re: [Europython-improve] Questions to send back to the proposal authors before we have the vote

2009-10-27 Thread Zeth
Many good points have been raised already, but one thing I would say to both proposals is make sure that you include in the room budget a dedicated, secure and large enough crew room. We learned by experience that having a private place to rehash arrangements, sort out problems and solve

Re: [Europython-improve] Questions to send back to the proposal authors before we have the vote

2009-10-22 Thread Laura Creighton
In a message of Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:41:24 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg writes: Laura Creighton wrote: I'm going to tell the original posters of both proposals to go start work on the clarifications at 21:00 tonight unless somebody tells me this is a very bad idea. I think all the people who wanted to

Re: [Europython-improve] Questions to send back to the proposal authors before we have the vote

2009-10-21 Thread Laura Creighton
I'm going to tell the original posters of both proposals to go start work on the clarifications at 21:00 tonight unless somebody tells me this is a very bad idea. I think all the people who wanted to comment and make suggestions have done so -- this is a check to see if I am correct. Thank you

Re: [Europython-improve] Questions to send back to the proposal authors before we have the vote

2009-10-20 Thread Laura Creighton
In a message of Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:38:52 +0200, Massa, Harald Armin writes: I entered 1 recommendation to each. may I suggest we prioritize the questions? All questions are very valuable ones, but at least some of them are not strictly necessary to make the decision for one of the venues. (but

Re: [Europython-improve] Questions to send back to the proposal authors before we have the vote

2009-10-20 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
Laura Creighton wrote: In a message of Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:38:52 +0200, Massa, Harald Armin writes: I entered 1 recommendation to each. may I suggest we prioritize the questions? All questions are very valuable ones, but at least some of them are not strictly necessary to make the decision

Re: [Europython-improve] Questions to send back to the proposal authors before we have the vote

2009-10-20 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
M.-A. Lemburg wrote: Laura Creighton wrote: In a message of Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:38:52 +0200, Massa, Harald Armin writes: I entered 1 recommendation to each. may I suggest we prioritize the questions? All questions are very valuable ones, but at least some of them are not strictly necessary

Re: [Europython-improve] Questions to send back to the proposal authors before we have the vote

2009-10-20 Thread Massa, Harald Armin
Good idea.  Do you want to make the first stab at prioritising? Yes. I stab. And after trying... I think the most important missing information regarding a possible decision is the budget plan for Italian proposal. the priorization led to the same result: a budget for italy, and the

Re: [Europython-improve] Questions to send back to the proposal authors before we have the vote

2009-10-20 Thread Laura Creighton
In a message of Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:48:51 +0200, Massa, Harald Armin writes: Good idea.  Do you want to make the first stab at prioritising? Yes. I stab. And after trying... I think the most important missing information regarding a possible decision is the budget plan for Italian proposal.

[Europython-improve] Questions to send back to the proposal authors before we have the vote

2009-10-19 Thread Laura Creighton
Richard Taylor sent me his suggestions for clarifications of the EP 2011 proposals. I've put them up on the wiki: http://wiki.europython.eu/RequestForClarifications The original proposals are at http://www2.openend.se/~lac/EP2011/ Please either send your comments to me, or, better yet edit