This was not intended as a joke or as a pseudo-The Onion article.
If pollution cannot be mitigated at the source (for whatever reason), and
that pollution is causing problems, and those affected have a way to take
action or are required to take action...things will probably be tried*.
(The tunnel
I see that my post was not clear.
I’m asking for any evidence that anyone at any agency, in the legislature, or
any NGO has actually proposed this.
- Mark
Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone
> On Sep 21, 2019, at 4:13 AM, Mark Abramowitz wrote:
>
> Please tell us why you think that this
From: Russ Sciville via EV
> I had to reply to this! Am I to understand that air scrubbers
> situated along highways will reduce pollution from vehicles? :-D
> That must be a joke.
Sadly, it's not. Irrational laws may require irrational solutions. If you're
required by law to improve air
I had to reply to this!Am I to understand that air scrubbers situated along
highways will reduce pollution from vehicles? :-D
That must be a joke. You would reduce more pollution by sealing the disk brakes
inside a container to catch brake dust which is heavily emitted from ICE's!EV's
are
If California loses its ability to directly set higher state-level
emissions standards (states rights?) ... expect to see workarounds tried.
The CA agreement with several automakers is one approach. Stationary and
portable air scrubbers* in cities and along highways are another approach
(possibly
https://www.sierraclub.org/press-releases/2019/09/sierra-club-denounces-trump-administration-s-indefensible-attack-states
Sierra Club Denounces Trump Administration’s Indefensible Attack on States’
Freedom to Curb Vehicle Pollution
September 18, 2019 larisa.manescu @sierraclub.org
WASHINGTON,
