; > level ground -- the loss of range is hardly noticeable.
> >
> > Lee Hart
> >
>
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/index.html
> INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/list
> From: Lee Hart
> You're rarely going to drive up a mountain so
> steep and long that you *double* your energy consumption going up, and
> expend *zero* energy coasting back down.
This is pretty well backed up by a hundred years or so of driving experience.
When was the last time you budgete
On 15 Oct 2020 at 10:30, Bill Dube via EV wrote:
> The 20% "EVDL" number represents the typical energy gain from
> having regen in mixed driving, versus not having regen and throwing the
> braking energy away to your brakes. Based on what I experienced driving my
> Leaf in Colorado, I would guess
In Colorado, you care about the loss of range when you change
altitude because you may not have enough range to; A) get to your
destination at the higher elevation, or, B) make the return trip from
some location at lower elevation.
For example, if you were to drive you brand new Leaf f
racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
>
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/index.html
INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA
EVDL Administrator via EV wrote:
On 14 Oct 2020 at 6:09, Jay Summet via EV wrote:
Regeneration is only about 20% efficient.
So they say - at least here on the EVDL. I've read similar declarations for
decades. But those statements aren't in accord with the data in the link I
provided.
http://
These people were able to get up to 18% on an i-MiEV measured on a dyno
https://www.mdpi.com/2032-6653/5/2/494/pdf
Jay
On 10/14/20 7:38 AM, EVDL Administrator via EV wrote:
On 14 Oct 2020 at 6:09, Jay Summet via EV wrote:
Regeneration is only about 20% efficient.
So they say - at leas
I think elevation becomes less significant because, in most cases, the
overall grade is pretty minimal. In so many words, this is essentially
what was explained in a lengthy post earlier (sorry, I can't remember
who wrote it).
For example, if I were to drive to Snoqualmie Pass, east of Seattle
vdl.org
Please discuss EV drag racing at NEDRA (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20201014/9611b492/attachment.html>
On 14 Oct 2020 at 6:09, Jay Summet via EV wrote:
> Regeneration is only about 20% efficient.
So they say - at least here on the EVDL. I've read similar declarations for
decades. But those statements aren't in accord with the data in the link I
provided.
http://evdl.org/pages/evergreen.html
Regeneration is only about 20% efficient. It saves you more power to
coast (not expend power) than to regenerate (try and re-capture power
you've already spent at 20% efficiency).
True, if you are high up, you can regain a lot of power, because you
have a lot of potential energybut it too
11 matches
Mail list logo
