Cor van de Water via EV wrote:
I doubt that the two achievements coincide... they probably
were able to push 22kW across an inductive link (at much greater loss
than the claimed 2.6%) and the claimed efficiency is only for the
inductive power transmission, and does not take into account any
elect
iscussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] EVLN: Greenfield, MA's dicey drunk freakazoids
unplugging EVs
Peter C. Thompson via EV wrote:
> BTW, I finally found a press release from someone other than Qualcomm
> Halo - claiming 97.4% efficiency.
I'll believe it when I see it. It's essent
Peter C. Thompson via EV wrote:
BTW, I finally found a press release from someone other than Qualcomm
Halo - claiming 97.4% efficiency.
I'll believe it when I see it. It's essentially impossible to build a
*transformer* that's 97.4% efficient at this power level -- let alone
the conversion lo
On 6/8/14, 10:54 AM, Lee Hart via EV wrote:
Dennis Miles via EV wrote:
My FIRST piece of advice is charging stations need to be "supervised."
Vandalism is a crime. Go to the Police and swear out a complaint .
Luckily, it's getting easier to install security cameras. They can
gather evidence.
Dennis Miles via EV wrote:
My FIRST piece of advice is charging stations need to be "supervised."
Vandalism is a crime. Go to the Police and swear out a complaint .
Luckily, it's getting easier to install security cameras. They can
gather evidence. Unfortunately, it still rarely leads to an ar
My FIRST piece of advice is charging stations need to be "supervised." Best
situation is "Valet Parking" worst is a remote parking lot. Vagrants, both
drunks and drug users or dealers need to be controlled by police action.
Vandalism is a crime. Go to the Police and swear out a complaint .
*Dennis
