On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Michael Ross via EV
wrote:
> Tesla have offered another product that is too expensive for half the
> population to ever consider. This product will have no noticeable effect
>
I see http://www.velkess.com/products/ is a company that makes flywheel
storage systems
On May 4, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Michael Ross wrote:
> Think decades.
But that's just it.
Power plants are intended to have a lifespan of decades, and to be profitable
over that lifespan.
Even if it takes 20 years to ramp up battery production...well, if you decided
today to build a new nuclear
We don't have enough batteries yet. I heard musk say we need hundreds of
gigafactories to make this kind of dent. We don't even know where to mine
the materials necessary. Some day, we can hope. Think decades.
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Ben Goren via EV wrote:
> Here's the link:
>
>
> h
Here's the link:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2015/05/01/did-tesla-just-kill-nuclear-power/
Key point: Tesla is set to sell utility-scale batteries to utilities for, as
the article puts it, about $0.02 / kWh. Filling those batteries from renewables
costs less than just running a nucl
Tesla have offered another product that is too expensive for half the
population to ever consider. This product will have no noticeable effect.
When SolarCity and others provide financing for people with no
discretionary income or credit, then the residential side could reduce the
need for nuclear
Did Tesla Just Kill Nuclear Power?
| |
| | | | | | | |
| Did Tesla Just Kill Nuclear Power?It would be almost three hours until
Tesla's big announcement, but inside a Northwestern University classroom near
Chicago Thursday night, the famed nuclear critic ... |
| |
| View on www.f
