Wei Dai wrote:
I don't understand how you can believe that the probability of more
dominant priors is zero. That implies if I offered you a bet of $1
versus your entire net worth that large scale quantum computation will
in fact work, you'd take that bet. Would you really?
Your dollar
Wei writes:
If you think about it more, I think you'll realize that the greater number
of observer-moments observing flying rabbits or similar happenings can't
make up for the much smaller measure of each such observer-moment.
Unfortunately right now I can't find a way to easily articulate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wei writes:
If by flying-rabbit you mean any deviation from simplicity, then I agree
with you. Notice that our own universe is full of quantum randomness, but
we don't see any pattern to the randomness. Similarly, an observer in a
Conway's life universe may
3 matches
Mail list logo
