Dear Saibal, you misunderstood my post. I did
not ask about "technicalities" of your sci-fi,
I simply suggested that you may not "play" to
get from here to there, but are "here" by a play
from "over there". Simply humor, nothing
else.
John
I don't see why one would want to go back,
A correction to my model corrected:
Near the end it should say:
>Evolving universes must be isomorphic to a portion of
one of these successive manifest counterfactuals. It is not required that
a particular universe always be isomorphic the counterfactual at a given
level of the nesting. Su
A correction to my model:
Near the end it should say:
>Evolving universes must be isomorphic to a portion of
one of these successive manifest counterfactuals. It is not required that
it always be the same one.
> The nesting would allow an infinite number of such universes.
Hal
I don't see why one would want to go back, but
there are still copies left in ordinary universes, there are universes in which
the probability to win will return to normal after a while. One should thus be
able to go back using a suicide machine. Also one could use memory erasure to go
back
Some people will sell one of their kidneys for just a few thousand dollars.
If I were a multi-multi-multi-billionaire I should be able to buy a kidney
for me after the operation.
George Levy wrote:
>
>
> > Saibal Mitra wrote:
> >
> > Suppose that every week I subject myself to a suicide experimen
I had the set of all possible universes in mind. But, as I wrote earlier (in
August), the set of all possible universes is contained in the MWI. The
reason is that there is a nonzero probability that you are be simulated by a
computer. This computer could run any program.
Saibal
Charles Goodwin
6 matches
Mail list logo
