I agree with George, but note that I arrive at an equivalent
assertion without using that lower levels have lower complexity
and therefore higher measure. That is possible, but
the problem is that it is a priori hard to estimate the dumbness
of the universal dovetailer which is quite capable to
Daer Bruno and George,
At the risk of being massively naive, does this idea seem to be related
to the infamous problem of Boltzmann's Stosszahlansatz?
http://www.lns.cornell.edu/spr/1999-02/msg0014388.html
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/1244/01/Winsberg_laws_and__statmech.doc
The following is a combination of several of my previous ideas which forces
me to raise a question re measure in this thread.
1) The first step is to examine the act of definition. In this case the
definition of a Nothing. Any definition process simultaneously defines
two entities. The
3 matches
Mail list logo
