Bruno and George,
amazing how accurately you describe in math
words what I
wrote in 1998 and put on the WEB in 1999, based
on the 1997 paper (Pre-Geometric origins) of Rainer Zimmermann - the NARRATIVE
(no math) of the (no Plato-based)Plenitude - Bigbangs unlimited, including ours.
No
Bruno Marchal wrote:
At 15:51 10/05/04 -0700, George Levy wrote:
BM: But you agree there is no plenitude without an UD.
GL: No I don't agree. I don't agree that the UD is the origin of all
things.
But to say that there is no plenitude without an UD does not mean that
the UD
is the origin of
Russell
OK. You are suffering from 3rd person thinking which leads you to these
conclusions:
1) As a scientist experimenting with this simulated creature, you
have absolutely no evidence that this creature is conscious.
2) You believe that the creature (conscious or unconscious) is
stuck in
Dear George,
My take of Russell's post is:
Unless the creature had some experience
that was not dismissible as a hallucination (1st person) and/or was witness by
others (a proxy of 3rd person?) that lead him to the conclusion that it existed
within a virtual reality then it would have no
Hi Stephen
Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear George,
My take of Russell's post is:
Unless the creature had some experience that
was not dismissible as a hallucination (1st person) and/or was witness
by others (a proxy of 3rd person?) that lead him to the conclusion that
I saw the documentary movie Tibet: Cry of the Snow Lion the other day.
In one scene, a group of monks is sitting around in a circle, and the
Dalai Llama is
overseeing.
The monks are industriously and methodically placing individual tiny
coloured
beads (there are maybe 4 or 5 colours)
around
The other thing to note about mandalas is that there can be more than
one possible pattern
that would maintain order and recursive complexity as it expands outward
(i.e. forward in time).
However, an observer subpattern embedded in one mandala (and created by
ITS rules of order)
can only see
At 15:51 10/05/04 -0700, George Levy wrote:
BM: But you agree there is no plenitude without an UD.
GL: No I don't agree. I don't agree that the UD is the origin of all things.
But to say that there is no plenitude without an UD does not mean that the UD
is the origin of all things.
This is
8 matches
Mail list logo
