Hi John:
My purpose for asking for comments re is "definition" a mathematical
process was to clear up some questions re my model.
1) Does my Everything - since it contains all does - it contain the
Nothing? Well it certainly contains its side of the defining boundary so
my current response is
Hal,
I agree (whatever it is worth) with the (empty or not) 'set' being
'something' in the nothing.
(I started my 'naive otology (1991) with 'nothingNESS', which is also more
than (your) nothing: containing an ontological qualifier, so it became
"SOMETHINGNESS" which was the startup of the world.
(
Re the discussion on mathematical realism etc. I ask for comments on
whether or not "definition" that is the division of "ALL" in to two parts
is a mathematical process.
To me "definition" seems arbitrary but some definitions result in
mathematical concepts such as the one I use which results i
At 03:25 PM 6/30/2004, CMR wrote (quoting www.fact-index.com):
"Mathematical realism holds that mathematical entities exist independently
of the human mind. Thus humans do not invent mathematics, but rather
discover it, and any other intelligent beings in the universe would
presumably do the same.
4 matches
Mail list logo
