Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

2004-12-10 Thread Jesse Mazer
Hal Ruhl wrote: "Meaning" can not be assigned as an inherent component of the All. That would be a selection. "Meaning" can only be assigned if at all within the wave of "physical reality" associated with an evolving Something. Evolving Somethings will eventually encompass pairs of counterfac

RE: Movie: WHAT THE BLEEP DO WE KNOW!?

2004-12-10 Thread Colin Hales
Hi Folks, A bit tardy..catching up... An early cut debut of this film was played at the quantum mind conference in March 2003. I saw it Came away feeling like someone was lecturing me about a quantum mechanical religion/cult. I don't know how the official version was, but we were all asked to

Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

2004-12-10 Thread Hal Ruhl
Hi Jesse: "Meaning" can not be assigned as an inherent component of the All. That would be a selection. "Meaning" can only be assigned if at all within the wave of "physical reality" associated with an evolving Something. Evolving Somethings will eventually encompass pairs of counterfactual a

Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

2004-12-10 Thread Jesse Mazer
Hal Ruhl wrote: A kernel of information is the that information constituting a particular potential to divide. The All contains all such kernels. The All is internally inconsistent because it contains for example a complete axiomatized arithmetic as well as an infinity of other such kernels of

Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

2004-12-10 Thread Hal Ruhl
To continue: As I said attach no significance to the little thought pictures I am using to illustrate various aspects of my system. They illustrate little chunks and then break down. The system has no net information. The Nothing has no internal information. The Everything is the boundary of bo