On 3/1/07, Tom Caylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you're seeking to break out of this circularity by introducing God,
who
doesn't need a creator, designer, source of meaning or morality,
containing
these qualities in himself necessarily rather than contingently. If
you're
happy to say
MP: .
That is one thing. Another thing is that no entity or set of entities
could know if their 'simulation' attempt was doing what they wanted in
every detail because to attempt to find this out would interfere
irreversibly with the unfolding of the world.
Brent:
This assumes that
Well, Brent, this was a post that requires multiple replies (marked JM) and a
longer reflection (with my apologies).
*
...individuals within that belief system will have a variety of views. Some
will have some views in conflict with the belief system.
JM: right. Some are converted to Islam as
On Mar 1, 5:26 am, Stathis Papaioannou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/1/07, Tom Caylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you're seeking to break out of this circularity by introducing God,
who
doesn't need a creator, designer, source of meaning or morality,
containing
these qualities in
Tom Caylor wrote:
On Feb 26, 4:33 pm, Stathis Papaioannou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/27/07, Tom Caylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thing that is different in this realm of true morality is that the
Creator is a person that we can get to know (not totally, but in a
process of growth just
Mark Peaty wrote:
No Brent, what I AM saying is that they are GONE! Well and truly
gorrnn!
But they lasted a lot longer than we have.
We could get side tracked into all sorts of discussions about how each
of the civilisations you named, waxed and waned more than once in the
John M wrote:
Well, Brent, this was a post that requires multiple replies (marked JM)
and a longer reflection (with my apologies).
*
...individuals within that belief system will have a variety of
views. Some will have some views in conflict with the belief system.
JM: right. Some are
7 matches
Mail list logo
