Le 10-sept.-07, à 21:03, John Mikes a écrit :
Dear Bruno, i failed to acknowledge your kind reply - and others
joining in - for the past month, not because I have been tied up with
'other' WEB lists, but because I realized that i have nothing to say
in kind of the language you use.
No
Bruno, you ARE a teacher (a good and passionate one) but your imagination is
insufficient. You cannot imagine how much I don't know. pick up 'words' and
'phrases' and apply common sense to them with a certain authoritative flair,
so those who understand the topic can think that I am talking
No(-)Justification Justifies The Everything Ensemble
Youness Ayaita
In this message, I present my no-justification of the hypothesis
that everything exists. The no-justification argues that no
justification at all is needed to accept the hypothesis. This provides
a new and very satisfying
Youness Ayaita wrote:
...
3 No-justification
The no-justification is the most satisfying justification for the
Everything ensemble I know. I even think that a more satisfying
justification is impossible in principle. So what is it about? The
crucial point is to try to get to the bottom of
On 12/09/2007, Brent Meeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. So where are the flying pigs?
Elsewhere. Existence is not a property, but position is.
--
Stathis Papaioannou
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
5 matches
Mail list logo
