It is clearly not an April fool's joke, but the question remains as to
whether it is a (reverse) Sokal hoax.
Cheers
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 10:10:01PM +0100, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
> Could this be an April fools' joke? The article does exist in
> arxiv.org but I find no evidence that it is real
Brian,
Your inquiries about FL is an uncharted but important one.
I'd like to suggest though that your approach is too
conventional and 'consistency' is not the ultimate
criteria for evaulating it's connection with validity
or more importantly - feasability - in context with
'logic' - and math
However, the crucial property of theories starting from the ensemble of worlds
consists
in their third person viewpoint. The ontological basis does not explicitly
refer to observers
nor to observer moments. Observers are regarded as being self-aware
substructures
of the worlds they inhabit.
Could this be an April fools' joke? The article does exist in
arxiv.org but I find no evidence that it is really going to be
published on Neuroquantology...
http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0382
Cheers,
Telmo Menezes.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Michael Rosefield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http:
I got this and the others you mentioned.
LN
_
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Bruno Marchal
Skickat: den 8 april 2008 12:13
Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: Little test
Hi,
Sorry but this is just a little test. I don't get any message from the
everything-list sinc
Hi,
Sorry but this is just a little test. I don't get any message from the
everything-list since the 3 april, including mine, although I can see
them in some archive.
Actually I did not get any of:
2008/04/07 Re: An Equivalence Principle Colin Hales
2008/04/07 Re: Bostrom
6 matches
Mail list logo
