John Mikes wrote:
> Dear Bruno,
>
> I decided so many times not to reflect to the esoteric sci-fi
> assumptions (thought experiments?) on this list - about situations
> beyond common sense, their use as templates for consequences.
> Now, however, I can't control my 'mouse' - in random and prob
Dear Bruno,
I decided so many times not to reflect to the esoteric sci-fi assumptions
(thought experiments?) on this list - about situations beyond common sense,
their use as templates for consequences.
Now, however, I can't control my 'mouse' - in random and probabilistics.
*
Bruno quotes in " -
Hi Günther,
On 07 Jan 2009, at 22:47, Günther Greindl wrote:
>
> thanks for your comments, I interleave my response.
>
>>> showed a glimpse of the vastness of the UD. And, I agree, _in the
>>> limit_
>>> there will be an infinite number of histories. So, as we have to
>>> also
>>> take into a
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> 2009/1/8 Brent Meeker :
>> Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>>> 2009/1/7 Abram Demski wrote:
>>>
I would not deny causality in such a universe so long as the logical
structure enforces the Life rules (meaning, the next level in the
stack is *always* the next
2009/1/8 Brent Meeker :
>
> Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>> 2009/1/7 Abram Demski wrote:
>>
>>> I would not deny causality in such a universe so long as the logical
>>> structure enforces the Life rules (meaning, the next level in the
>>> stack is *always* the next life-tick, it couldn't be somethi
5 matches
Mail list logo
