On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Brian Tenneson wrote:
> We're talking about a mathematical theory about E.
What relevance does this comment have?
--
silky
http://dnoondt.wordpress.com/ (Noon Silk) | http://www.mirios.com.au:8081 >
"Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy
We're talking about a mathematical theory about E.
silky wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Brian Tenneson wrote:
[...]
One way to describe something, a real basic way to describe something,
is to form an aggregate of all things that meet that description.
There may be no effective p
I was unaware of this. Seems like it's a crucial part of Bruno's
work.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dovetailing_%28computer_science%29
Trying to understand the concept here.
Suppose there are infinitely many instructions of two programs. One
way to run that program is to start putting green dot
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Brian Tenneson wrote:
[...]
>> > One way to describe something, a real basic way to describe something,
>> > is to form an aggregate of all things that meet that description.
>> > There may be no effective procedure for deciding whether or not A is
>> > in that a
>
> > How can we know that? "Reality is the totality of all that exists" is
> > a finite complete description.
>
> Well, that is my favorite definition of reality. But it is not a
> theory: you don't say what exist.
> RA says what exist. It says that 1 exists (Ex(x = s(0)), it says that
> you
5 matches
Mail list logo
