Re: Do we live within a Diophantine equation?

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: ​​ If you want to use Euclidean geometry or even the sort of non-Euclidean geometry Einstein used you've got to use standard arithmetic, but there are other ways. For example, in the 7-adic system the distance between 5

Re: Radioactive Decay States

On Wednesday, July 11, 2018 at 2:16:24 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 4:42:44 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 7/10/2018 3:01 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> *IIRC, the above quote is also in the Wiki article. It's not a coherent >> argument;

Re: Radioactive Decay States

> Il 12 luglio 2018 alle 3.57 agrayson2...@gmail.com ha scritto: > > > > On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 11:23:55 PM UTC-6, scerir wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Il 11 luglio 2018 alle 0.01 agrays...@gmail.com ha > > scritto: > > > > > > > > > > > > On

Re: Bootstrapping Reality: The inconsistency of nothing

From: *Bruno Marchal* mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be> On 12 Jul 2018, at 04:04, Bruce Kellett > wrote: There are no up' or down' branches. ? (That contradicts directly what you just said). A up-branch is just a branch where Alice saw or would see “up”. You were

Re: Bootstrapping Reality: The inconsistency of nothing

> On 12 Jul 2018, at 04:04, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > From: Bruno Marchal mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>> >>> On 9 Jul 2018, at 14:07, Bruce Kellett >> > wrote: >>> Sure, this is a property of the singlet state in standard QM, because >>> Alice's measurement

Re: Primary matter

> On 11 Jul 2018, at 14:02, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > Hi Bruno, > > Another long delay… Hi Telmo, No problem. That is why I prefer mail than phone, we can think before answering, or take some rest :) > >> I am not sure I commented your first paragraph, which might be a key for >>