Re: Tao and Physics

Question: If God is the 3-character ASCII sequence G-O-D, does that require God to be American? If not, then what, Unicode? UTF-8? ISO/IEC 10646? Same for Bruno, I am also curious about this question for notation for the Löbian Machine. And if not for this very instant, then I ask what

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 at 2:54:46 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 2 Oct 2018, at 17:11, Philip Thrift > > wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 9:25:17 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 2 Oct 2018, at 09:53, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, October

Re: Tao and Physics

On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 at 11:45:25 AM UTC-5, spudb...@aol.com wrote: > > Here is the 3 letter ascii symbol for God >¯\_(ツ)_/¯ > Flying nun /‾‾(ツ)‾‾\ - pt > > > > -Original Message- > From: John Clark > > To: everything-list > > Sent: Wed,

Re: Tao and Physics

On 10/3/2018 1:10 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Consider any digital machine. It corresponds to some number k (such that phi_k(x) = y describes the behaviour of the machine k) (digital machine are recursively enumerable). The theology of the machine k is define by the set of all true sentence

Re: Tao and Physics

Here is the 3 letter ascii symbol for God ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -Original Message- From: John Clark To: everything-list Sent: Wed, Oct 3, 2018 12:10 pm Subject: Re: Tao and Physics On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 11:27 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: > Please read Plotinus or Proclus

Re: Tao and Physics

Read both. Made me wonder about the quantum & Bohmian mechanics? -Original Message- From: John Clark To: everything-list Sent: Tue, Oct 2, 2018 9:53 am Subject: Re: Tao and Physics On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:53 AM Lawrence Crowell wrote: > Fritz Capra wrote a book titled The

Re: Tao and Physics

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 11:27 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: > > *Please read Plotinus or Proclus* > Not a snowball's chance in hell!! I'd learn more science and mathematics from reading Mother Goose. >>So there is not one God there are an infiniti of them > > > *>No, there is only one. The reason

Re: Tao and Physics

> On 3 Oct 2018, at 14:51, John Clark wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:10 AM Bruno Marchal > wrote: > > >>Bruno, whenever you use that word [theology] or the G word you just lose > >>me, I don't know what you're talking about. > > >Consider any digital machine.

Re: Tao and Physics

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:10 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: >>Bruno, whenever you use that word [theology] or the G word you just lose >> me, I don't know what you're talking about. > > *>Consider any digital machine. It corresponds to some number k [...] The > theology of the machine k is define by

Re: Tao and Physics

> On 2 Oct 2018, at 18:18, John Clark wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:04 PM Bruno Marchal > wrote: > > > Mysticism is certainly not bullshit when you understand that any universal > > number/set believing in “enoughinduction” axioms discover his own theology >

Re: Mathematical Universe Hypothesis

> On 2 Oct 2018, at 17:11, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 9:25:17 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 2 Oct 2018, at 09:53, Philip Thrift > >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 2:20:10 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 1 Oct 2018,