On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 07:34:19PM -0700, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
wrote:
>
>
> On 9/9/2019 6:55 PM, Tomasz Rola wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 06:40:44PM -0700, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
> >wrote:
> >>Why escape to space when there a lots of resources here? An AI with
>
On 9/9/2019 6:55 PM, Tomasz Rola wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 06:40:44PM -0700, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
wrote:
Why escape to space when there a lots of resources here? An AI with
access to everything connected to the internet shouldn't have any
trouble taking control of the
On Monday, September 9, 2019 at 11:37:25 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 1:32 PM Alan Grayson > wrote:
>
> *> Why do you think this has anything to do with intelligence and
>> reasoning ability?*
>>
>
> Oh for heaven's sake! This whistling past the graveyard is getting
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 06:40:44PM -0700, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
wrote:
> Why escape to space when there a lots of resources here? An AI with
> access to everything connected to the internet shouldn't have any
> trouble taking control of the Earth.
>
> Brent
Have a look around, or
Why escape to space when there a lots of resources here? An AI with
access to everything connected to the internet shouldn't have any
trouble taking control of the Earth.
Brent
On 9/9/2019 6:00 PM, Tomasz Rola wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 08:09:48PM +, spudboy100 via Everything List
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 08:09:48PM +, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
> I concur-which may discourage you? On a small futurist pocket I post
> to, I asked someone who seemed to take AI very seriously, what would
> we be looking at if a Singularity was actually approaching. In other
>
I concur-which may discourage you? On a small futurist pocket I post to, I
asked someone who seemed to take AI very seriously, what would we be looking at
if a Singularity was actually approaching. In other words, something like
precursors. His view was that we will see greatly increased
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 1:32 PM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> Why do you think this has anything to do with intelligence and reasoning
> ability?*
>
Oh for heaven's sake! This whistling past the graveyard is getting
ridiculous.
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On Monday, September 9, 2019 at 4:06:33 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>
> Just 4 years ago 700 AI programs competed against each other and tried to
> pass a 8th-Grade multiple choice Science Test and win a $80,000 prize, but
> they all flunked, the best one only got 59.3% of the questions
On Sunday, September 8, 2019 at 1:48:41 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> Let us discuss ideas, and if you disagree with one thing I say, it would
> be nice to explain what.
>
Why? So you can dismiss it until a Stanford entry is written for you to
dismiss with the infamous correct
On Sunday, September 8, 2019 at 9:02:15 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, September 8, 2019 at 1:28:36 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, September 8, 2019 at 12:47:28 AM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, September 7, 2019 at 2:05:11 PM
I thought 94% was the lowest A (A-).
@philipthrift
On Monday, September 9, 2019 at 5:06:33 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
>
> Just 4 years ago 700 AI programs competed against each other and tried to
> pass a 8th-Grade multiple choice Science Test and win a $80,000 prize, but
> they all flunked,
Just 4 years ago 700 AI programs competed against each other and tried to
pass a 8th-Grade multiple choice Science Test and win a $80,000 prize, but
they all flunked, the best one only got 59.3% of the questions correct. But
last Wednesday the Allen Institute unveiled a AI called "Aristo" that
13 matches
Mail list logo
