Re: C60 Interference

On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 7:53:17 PM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: > > IIUC, as the temperature rises, interference in the double slit C60 > experiment declines, and eventually disappears. I don't think this is > really a which-way experiment because the interference disappears whether > or

Re: On the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Andrew Steane)

On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 6:23:14 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > > On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 4:17:28 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11/3/2019 10:43 AM, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> In order for this statement to be useful, we need to solve the preferred >> basis problem. For

Re: BH question

On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 6:56:55 PM UTC-7, Alan Grayson wrote: > > According to QM, does time stop at the event horizon of a BH? TIA, AG > Sorry; I meant according to GR. AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubs

BH question

According to QM, does time stop at the event horizon of a BH? TIA, AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroup

C60 Interference

IIUC, as the temperature rises, interference in the double slit C60 experiment declines, and eventually disappears. I don't think this is really a which-way experiment because the interference disappears whether or not which-way is observed. How does this effect the collapse issue? Usually, IIU

Re: On the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Andrew Steane)

On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 4:17:28 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: > > > > On 11/3/2019 10:43 AM, Philip Thrift wrote: > > In order for this statement to be useful, we need to solve the preferred > basis problem. For example, consider the mathematical identity > > |u a w> + |e d c> = |n+ s+ f+> + |n+ s