Re: Anna Stubblefield

2015-10-22 Thread Brent Meeker
On 10/21/2015 8:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 21 Oct 2015, at 00:59, Brent Meeker wrote: A strange, and sad, case. But Facilitated Communication would seem to be a corollary of Bruno's idea that conscious persons are "out there" in platonia and just need the proper physics in order to

Re: Anna Stubblefield

2015-10-22 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 22 Oct 2015, at 08:06, Brent Meeker wrote: On 10/21/2015 8:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 21 Oct 2015, at 00:59, Brent Meeker wrote: A strange, and sad, case. But Facilitated Communication would seem to be a corollary of Bruno's idea that conscious persons are "out there" in

Re: Anna Stubblefield

2015-10-22 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 21 Oct 2015, at 18:17, Jesse Mazer wrote: Isn't there a pretty strong consensus among the experts that "facilitated communication" is actually a Ouija board like phenomenon where the facilitator is actually determining all the letters through small muscle movements (the 'ideomotor

Re: Anna Stubblefield

2015-10-21 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 21 Oct 2015, at 00:59, Brent Meeker wrote: A strange, and sad, case. But Facilitated Communication would seem to be a corollary of Bruno's idea that conscious persons are "out there" in platonia and just need the proper physics in order to interact with us.

Re: Anna Stubblefield

2015-10-21 Thread Jesse Mazer
Isn't there a pretty strong consensus among the experts that "facilitated communication" is actually a Ouija board like phenomenon where the facilitator is actually determining all the letters through small muscle movements (the 'ideomotor effect'), whether consciously or subconsciously? >From

Anna Stubblefield

2015-10-20 Thread Brent Meeker
A strange, and sad, case. But Facilitated Communication would seem to be a corollary of Bruno's idea that conscious persons are "out there" in platonia and just need the proper physics in order to interact with us.