I found a paper that might be of interest to those interested in
Tegmark's work.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.0867
Abstract
I discuss some problems related to extreme mathematical realism,
focusing on a recently proposed shut-up-and-calculate approach to
physics (arXiv:0704.0646
Exercise: criticize the following papers mentioned below in the light
of the discovery of the universal machine and its main consequences
from incompleteness to first person indeterminacy. Think of the
identity thesis. To be sure Tegmark is less wrong than Jannes.
Solution: search in the
Comments below.
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Exercise: criticize the following papers mentioned below in the light
of the discovery of the universal machine and its main consequences
from incompleteness to first person indeterminacy. Think of the
identity thesis. To be sure Tegmark is less wrong
On 21 Jul 2009, at 00:22, Brian Tenneson wrote:
Comments below.
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Exercise: criticize the following papers mentioned below in the
light of the discovery of the universal machine and its main
consequences from incompleteness to first person indeterminacy.
Think of
Arxiv.org:0904.0867v1
I think the author presents some good arguments.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To
5 matches
Mail list logo
