Re: Dreams and measure

2009-02-12 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 11 Feb 2009, at 18:30, Saibal Mitra wrote: Welcome back Jack Mallah! I have a different argument against QTI. I had a nice dream last night, but unfortunately it suddenly ended. Now, this is empirical evidence against QTI because, according to the QTI, the life expectancy of the

Re: Dreams and measure

2009-02-12 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 11 Feb 2009, at 21:51, Brent Meeker wrote: Saibal Mitra wrote: Welcome back Jack Mallah! I have a different argument against QTI. I had a nice dream last night, but unfortunately it suddenly ended. Now, this is empirical evidence against QTI because, according to the QTI, the life

Re: Dreams and measure

2009-02-11 Thread Quentin Anciaux
You were not the simulated one in your dreams, hence you can't say anything about its life expectancy... :) 2009/2/11 Saibal Mitra smi...@zonnet.nl Welcome back Jack Mallah! I have a different argument against QTI. I had a nice dream last night, but unfortunately it suddenly ended. Now,

Re: Dreams and measure

2009-02-11 Thread Jack Mallah
Hello again, Saibal! It is good to see that I am not alone here in taking a stand against QS/QI. What do you think of my paper? Is it unclear, convincing, unconvincing? Are there others like us who still post here? Regards, Jack

Re: Dreams and measure

2009-02-11 Thread Brent Meeker
Saibal Mitra wrote: Welcome back Jack Mallah! I have a different argument against QTI. I had a nice dream last night, but unfortunately it suddenly ended. Now, this is empirical evidence against QTI because, according to the QTI, the life expectancy of the version of me simulated in

Re: Dreams and measure

2009-02-11 Thread Stathis Papaioannou
2009/2/12 Saibal Mitra smi...@zonnet.nl: Welcome back Jack Mallah! I have a different argument against QTI. I had a nice dream last night, but unfortunately it suddenly ended. Now, this is empirical evidence against QTI because, according to the QTI, the life expectancy of the version of