On 17 Aug 2012, at 20:53, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/17/2012 10:30 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi meekerdb
In my view (perhaps not yours) things are as they are and move as
they
do for a reason, called sufficient reason.
Science is the pursuit of sufficient reasons.
I doubt that. I think science is
: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-16, 12:35:53
Subject: Re: Leibniz on the unconscious
On 16 Aug 2012, at 16:52, Roger wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
That's Cosmic Clockmaker argument.
I don't think so. If I am machine, neither God, nor physical
reality, nor consciousness, nor
the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-18, 06:55:33
Subject: Re: Leibniz on the unconscious
On 17 Aug 2012, at 22:40, Roger wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
I apologize for my abruptness. Agreed, mathematics can have God-like powers.
Nice.
By blueprint
: Leibniz on the unconscious
On 8/14/2012 10:42 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything
could function.
And I'd say why can't everything just function by itself? If God is just a
placeholder word for whatever it is that makes
On 8/17/2012 10:30 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi meekerdb
In my view (perhaps not yours) things are as they are and move as they
do for a reason, called sufficient reason.
Science is the pursuit of sufficient reasons.
I doubt that. I think science is about finding good explanations, and good means
everything
could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-15, 04:45:32
Subject: Re: Leibniz on the unconscious
On 14 Aug 2012, at 20:28, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/14/2012 10:42 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Leibniz would say
, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
everything could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-15, 04:45:32
Subject: Re: Leibniz on the unconscious
On 14 Aug 2012, at 20:28, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/14/2012 10:42 AM, Roger
-list
Time: 2012-08-11, 18:23:30
Subject: Re: Leibniz on the unconscious
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:14 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 8/11/2012 5:13 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi meekerdb
�
Leibniz seems to be the first philosopher (and one of the few)爐o
discuss the
unconscious, which
On 14 Aug 2012, at 20:28, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/14/2012 10:42 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
everything could function.
And I'd say why can't everything just function by itself? If God
is just a placeholder word for
),
it is?n
integral part of his metaphysical system.?
?
In Leibniz's metaphysics, the lowest or bare naked monads (as in rocks)?re
unconscious bodies.
Leibniz ways that they are very drowsy or asleep. They lie in darkness.
?
Animals can feel but not think.
And your evidence for this is?
Here
Hi meekerdb
Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything
could function.
Roger , rclo...@verizon.net
8/14/2012
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-11, 18:14:45
Subject: Re: Leibniz
On 8/14/2012 10:42 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything could
function.
And I'd say why can't everything just function by itself? If God is just a placeholder
word for whatever it is that makes things work it doesn't add
On 8/11/2012 5:13 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Leibniz seems to be the first philosopher (and one of the few) to discuss the
unconscious, which was necessary, since like God (or some Cosmic intelligence),
it is an
integral part of his metaphysical system.
In Leibniz's metaphysics, the lowest or
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:14 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 8/11/2012 5:13 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi meekerdb
Leibniz seems to be the first philosopher (and one of the few) to discuss
the
unconscious, which was necessary, since like God (or some Cosmic
intelligence), it is an
14 matches
Mail list logo
