Re: R: Re: R: Re: A profound lack of profundity

2017-08-16 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 15 Aug 2017, at 12:08, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote: Spudboy100: One consciousness, yourself, of with everyone else, spanning other Everett Universes? "The reason why our sentient, percipient and thinking ego is met nowhere within our scientific world picture can easily be

R: Re: R: Re: A profound lack of profundity

2017-08-15 Thread 'scerir' via Everything List
Spudboy100: One consciousness, yourself, of with everyone else, spanning other Everett Universes? Normal 0 14 false false false IT X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Re: R: Re: A profound lack of profundity

2017-08-14 Thread spudboy100 via Everything List
bject: R: Re: A profound lack of profundity First person, second person, and third person are basically grammatical categories: first person, I/we, second person, you/you, third person, him/them. The third independent person plays a central role in the interpretation of perceptual evidence in terms

Re: R: Re: A profound lack of profundity

2017-08-13 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 13 Aug 2017, at 09:30, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote: First person, second person, and third person are basically grammatical categories: first person, I/we, second person, you/you, third person, him/them. The third independent person plays a central role in the interpretation

Re: R: Re: A profound lack of profundity

2017-08-13 Thread Brent Meeker
I didn't read it either because it wanted access to all my contacts. But Shan Gao has a number of papers on arXiv.org. He has some peculiar ideas about QM. Brent On 8/13/2017 12:30 AM, 'scerir' via Everything List wrote: First person, second person, and third person are basically