-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Brent Meeker
Skickat: den 10 juli 2006 23:04
Till: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Ämne: Re: SV: Only logic is necessary?
I'd say the decision to use classical logic is an
assumption
: den 10 juli 2006 03:06
Till: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Ämne: Re: SV: Only logic is necessary?
Brent Meeker wrote:
1Z wrote:
Brent Meeker wrote:
You misunderstand population models. It's not a question of what
members of a species think or
vote for; it's a matter of whether
Lennart Nilsson wrote:
Cooper says that a formalist, with only formal constraints on his logic
(such as consistensy) is at the mercy of the formalism itself.
Meaning what ? That the formalism might not be giving answers
that are really right ? How would we tell ? using some
other logic ? Or
Till: Everything List
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Only logic is necessary?
Lennart Nilsson wrote:
Cooper says that a formalist, with only formal constraints on his logic
(such as consistensy) is at the mercy of the formalism itself.
Meaning what ? That the formalism might not be giving answers
Lennart Nilsson wrote:
You seem to think that evolution (or matter, or the multiverse) must adapt
to a preordained logic.
No, no , noo !
I am trying to get away from the idea that logic needs to
be propped up by some external authority. The validity
of logic comes about from the lack of any
Skickat: den 9 juli 2006 10:08
Till: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Ämne: RE: SV: Only logic is necessary?
Lennart Nilsson wrote:
No, you have the burden of showing what possible worlds could possibly mean
outside a real biological setting.
Cooper shows that logical laws are dependent
Lennart Nilsson wrote:
We use mathematics as a meta-language, just like you kan describe what is
said in latin by using italian. That does not make italian
logically/evolutionary prior to latin of course.
But in this case we are using mathematics to describe actual events in the
real world,
Jesse Mazer wrote:
Lennart Nilsson wrote:
We use mathematics as a meta-language, just like you kan describe what is
said in latin by using italian. That does not make italian
logically/evolutionary prior to latin of course.
But in this case we are using mathematics to describe actual events
Brent Meeker wrote:
Jesse Mazer wrote:
Lennart Nilsson wrote:
We use mathematics as a meta-language, just like you kan describe what
is
said in latin by using italian. That does not make italian
logically/evolutionary prior to latin of course.
But in this case we are using
Jesse Mazer wrote:
Brent Meeker wrote:
Jesse Mazer wrote:
Lennart Nilsson wrote:
We use mathematics as a meta-language, just like you kan describe what
is
said in latin by using italian. That does not make italian
logically/evolutionary prior to latin of course.
But in this case we
2006 16:11
Till: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Ämne: Re: SV: Only logic is
necessary?
Le 06-juil.-06, à 21:49, Lennart Nilsson a écrit :
Bruno;
According
to Cooper classical analysis is plain bad biology,
?
and
not a matter of subjective judgement or philosophical preferens
11 matches
Mail list logo