All,
I almost hesitate to post this. It's obvious nonsense but a good example of
how science can be wildly misinterpeted. But on the other hand some people
on this group will no doubt take it seriously since it is compatible with
some of the other MWI fantasies advocated here. Will be
Yeah, I have read Lanza, don't forget Bob Berman (astronomer) and the
Biocentrism hypothesis. Lanza has not written on biocentrism for the last
couple of years. Incidentally, MWI, David Deustch, and Max Tegmark, not
withstanding, is not falsifiable. So, any fantasy is no worse then the theory
On 21 January 2014 00:01, Edgar L. Owen edgaro...@att.net wrote:
All,
I almost hesitate to post this. It's obvious nonsense but a good example of
how science can be wildly misinterpeted. But on the other hand some people
on this group will no doubt take it seriously since it is compatible
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.comwrote:
On 21 January 2014 00:01, Edgar L. Owen edgaro...@att.net wrote:
All,
I almost hesitate to post this. It's obvious nonsense but a good example
of
how science can be wildly misinterpeted. But on the other hand
4 matches
Mail list logo
