From: Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Request for a glossary of acronyms
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 16:11:39 +0100
Here is an interesting post by Jesse. Curiously I have not been able to
find it
in the archive, but luckily I find it in my computer memory.
Is that
Here is an interesting post by Jesse. Curiously I have not been able to find it
in the archive, but luckily I find it in my computer memory.
Is that normal? I will try again later.
Jesse's TOE pet is very similar to the type of TOE compatible with the comp
hyp, I guess everyone can see that.
Jesse
I mainly agree with all your remark, except that the notion of 'truth" is
needed to define knowledge and the notion of first person. Nobody proposes
to get the Whole Truth ...
You terminate by a question I quote "so what's the big fat hairy deal?":
the deal with comp is that we must derive the l
test
<>
Corrections inserted here to the following paragraph of my previous
post. (Apologies for the sloppiness.)
Eric Hawthorne wrote:
so truth itself, as
a relationship between representative symbols and that which is
(possibly) represented, is probably a limited
concept, and the limitation has to d
5 matches
Mail list logo