Hi Russell,
Let me try to be a little more specific. You say in your Occam paper
at http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks/docs/occam/node4.html
The first assumption to be made is that observers will find themselves
embedded in a temporal dimension. A Turing machine requires time to
separate the
I think that psychological time fits the bill. The observer needs a
a temporal dimension in which to appreciate differences between
states.
Physical time presupposes a physics, which I haven't done in
Occam.
It is obviously a little more structured than an ordering. A space
dimension is
Dear Russel,
Could we associate this psychological time with the orderings that
obtain when considering successive measurements of various measurements of
non-commutative canonically conjugate (QM) states?
Also, re your Occam's razor paper, have you considered the necessity of
a
3 matches
Mail list logo
