Dear Stephen,
Kim Jones' post prompts me to ask whether or not a
self-referentially-correct Loebian machine involves an infinite
regress or a non-well founded structure. Given that it is typical to
include the idea of a non-prescripted interview, where the questions
can have follow ups
Conversations with God by Neale Donald Walsch (Hodder and Stoughton
1995) is a bloddy good read as we like to say here in Australia. It
is, in some ways the *kind* of revisionist theological tome the
modern world badly needs. For this reason, God speaks in a language
that any idiot can
Kim Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] said
Conversations with God by Neale Donald Walsch (Hodder and
Stoughton
1995) is a bloddy good read as we like to say here in Australia
I think myself that one problem with such books is that they are very
Christian oriented. I recently heard a lecture by David
Bruno,
Going back to the discussion a few days ago, I agree with the value of
the UDA as an idea worthy of development, as you are doing. In fact it
seems to be the only idea on the table that I'm aware of that provides
some explanation for the 1-indeterminacy of QM and also gives insight
into
4 matches
Mail list logo
