On 04 Mar 2010, at 06:44, Rex Allen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
I may be absent for a period, for reason of sciatica.
Best,
Bruno
No worries! I will be a bit delayed on my response anyway. All is
well!
I am back home ...because they
On 04 Mar 2010, at 22:59, Jack Mallah wrote:
Bruno, I hope you feel better.
Thanks.
My quarrel with you is nothing personal.
Why would I think so?
Now I am warned.
--- Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Jack Mallah wrote:
Bruno, you don't have to assume any 'prescience'; you
On Mar 5, 8:43 am, Jack Mallah jackmal...@yahoo.com wrote:
and in any case is a thought experiment.
The term seems particularly appropriate in this case!
Charles
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send
--- On Wed, 3/3/10, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if you overlooked it but the key condition in my paper is that
the inputs to the remaining brain are identical to what they would have been
if the whole brain were present. Thus, the neural activity in the
On 3/5/2010 11:58 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
In this list I have already well explained the seven step of UDA, and
one difficulty remains in the step 8, which is the difference between
a computation and a description of computation. Due to the static
character of Platonia, some believes it
On 3/5/2010 1:29 PM, Charles wrote:
--- On Wed, 3/3/10, Stathis Papaioannoustath...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if you overlooked it but the key condition in my paper is that the
inputs to the remaining brain are identical to what they would have been if the
whole brain were present.
6 matches
Mail list logo
