On 09 May 2014, at 02:22, LizR wrote:
On 9 May 2014 05:07, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 08 May 2014, at 00:35, LizR wrote:
(By the way I think Max Tegmark does a good job of explaining what
this means in his book, even if he doesn't get to the reversal. He
says you need to
Posting the verses and science article links above your query, and response
to your query below your it, for ease of reading:
*Honey Bee* [Quran 16:68-69]
68 And inspired your Lord to the Bee that Take [second person female
singular] among the mountains houses, and among the trees, and in what
Links on Ant Communication below your comment:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:42 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 May 2014 16:16, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:24 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, good point. It seems likely to me that people
Parts 1 2 of an interview based on Christopher Hitchen's book about God:
Part 1: https://vimeo.com/94004548
Part 2: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=787228407968996
Samiya
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 11:45:32 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 9:40:58 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:39 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
A 928 MeV photon is a very high energy photon. It is off the scale of
every chart I have ever seen of the electric magnetic spectrum. Why don’t
you send me your chart showing your 500 GeV photon.
The existence of
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:03 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
My theory does not violate conservation of mass-energy.
And all you need to do to show the world that it doesn't is to prove
mathematically that .51 +.51 = .51 +.51 +.928. I mean how hard can it be to
prove that 1.02 =
Good questions.
The Black Holes gravity is very constant because the destruction of each proton
first requires the creation of an anti-proton. Anti-proton are created by the
combination of a neutrino entron and a positron to produce a very massive
positron (having an energy-mass almost
Yes, each entron is comprised to two tronnies. Three entrons combine to create
and electron and a positron. Before and after you have six tronnies.
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Russell Standish
Sent:
Another excellent question!
Coulomb’s Law requires that the basic particle with single charge must be a
point particle. If it had any size at all, parts of the particle would repel
the other parts and it would blow itself apart at the speed of the Coulomb
which is the speed of light. Like
In much the same spirit take a look at this cartoon:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODetOE6cbbclist=PLECD9ACF9D6F1F8FF
John K Clark
=
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:51 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does this sort of thing never work for me? It's almost like a higher
power is
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:29 PM, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.comwrote:
Coulomb’s Law requires that the basic particle with single charge must be
a point particle. If it had any size at all, parts of the particle would
repel the other parts and it would blow itself apart
Unlike the
Oops. I forgot to include the link: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.0126v1.pdf
Original Message
I don't buy it. For one thing memory IS lossy and it's largely reconstruction. I think
their argument only shows that cognition is irreversible in a stat-mech sense. The
I don't buy it. For one thing memory IS lossy and it's largely reconstruction. I think
their argument only shows that cognition is irreversible in a stat-mech sense. The
implication for saying 'yes' or 'no' to the doctor would be that substituting for a small
part of your brain might
Agree. Very odd to make the statement Since lossy integration would
necessitate continuous damage to existing memories appear to be so
controversial that it necessitates the move to a theory of lossless
integration. What could be more natural than memories that degrade? I
suppose there are folks
On 10 May 2014 04:06, John Ross jr...@trexenterprises.com wrote:
Good questions.
The Black Holes gravity is very constant because the destruction of each
proton first requires the creation of an anti-proton. Anti-proton are
created by the combination of a neutrino entron and a positron
Quite apart from anything else, why does your new particle sport such a
ridiculously Walt Disney-sounding name? Every time I read the word tronnie I
just about crack up...
Kim Jones B. Mus. GDTL
Email: kimjo...@ozemail.com.au
kmjco...@icloud.com
Mobile: 0450 963 719
Phone: 02
As Mr Ross mentioned, he was originally going to call them trons, but it
turns out Walt Disney has already got the rights to that name (at least in
the singular) due to a famous film from the 1980s, so he went with tronnies
instead.
I suspect that the name is the least of the problems with this
I guess one could start from is physics computable? (As Max Tegmark
discusses in his book, but I haven't yet read what his conclusions are, if
any). If physics is computable and consciousness arises somehow in a
materialist-type way from the operation of the brain, then consciousness
will be
On 9 May 2014 23:03, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
Links on Ant Communication below your comment:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:42 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 May 2014 16:16, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:24 AM, LizR
I don't have time to look into this in detail right now, but my initial
feeling (I may change my mind after further consideration) is that this is
probably the most important part of what Dr Khalid Zaheer has to say:
However, in our keenness to find signs we should not put into the mouth of
the
I don't like links to facebook, which always tries to make me join before
it will even let me view what is at the link. This sort of arrogance is
exactly why I have no interest in joining facebook.
On 9 May 2014 23:08, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
Parts 1 2 of an interview
On Saturday, May 10, 2014, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess one could start from is physics computable? (As Max Tegmark
discusses in his book, but I haven't yet read what his conclusions are, if
any). If physics is computable and consciousness arises somehow in a
materialist-type way
23 matches
Mail list logo
