Hal wrote:
> > >I wonder if you consider the possibility that there is no matter of fact
> > >as to whether we are living in a simulation? Suppose that we live in real
> > >life, and also get simulated one or more times, then our consciousness
> > >cannot be localized to any specific instantiati
Russel wrote:
> Saibal Mitra wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hal wrote:
> >
> >
> > > One of the concepts we have explored is that all universes and hence
> > > all minds exist, but that some observer-moments have greater "measure"
> > > than others. This may help to explain why we observe the kind of
univer
Saibal Mitra wrote:
>
>
> Hal wrote:
>
>
> > One of the concepts we have explored is that all universes and hence
> > all minds exist, but that some observer-moments have greater "measure"
> > than others. This may help to explain why we observe the kind of universe
> > that we do, because we
Nick Bostrom wrote:
``Saibal wrote:
A proper calculation using Bayes' theorem is missing in the article. The
conclusion is false.
E.g. let's assume that (2) and (3) are false. So, we know with almost 100%
certainty that we are not living in a simulation, and we know with almost
100% certainty
Hal wrote:
> One of the concepts we have explored is that all universes and hence
> all minds exist, but that some observer-moments have greater "measure"
> than others. This may help to explain why we observe the kind of universe
> that we do, because we must be observer-moments that have rel
5 matches
Mail list logo
