Re: Infinite computing

2003-02-11 Thread Jesse Mazer
I was wondering, if it's true that Hawking radiation always causes a black hole to evaporate after some finite time, wouldn't that mean that any observer travelling into one will see it evaporate before he crosses the event horizon? Is it possible that quantum gravity could do away with the

Re: Infinite computing: A paper

2003-02-11 Thread Jean-Michel Veuillen
At 03:21 PM 2/10/2003 -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote: Dear Jean-Michel and Hal, All good humor aside, Hal makes a good point! The conditions that would exist as one approaches the event horizon seem to be such that any signal would be randomized such that the end result would be that Nature

Re: Infinite computing

2003-02-11 Thread Stephen Paul King
Dear George, As I read your post I was struck by the necessary assumptions that you noted: 1) that the black hole is large enough that the tidal forces do not rip apart the observer falling into it2) death occurs in one branch of the multiverse but not in another. What if we considered

Infinite computing;self-organization

2003-02-11 Thread James N Rose
Here is a line of reasoning that is a frontal assault on extant (inadequate) AI paradigms conjoined with the question of 'self-organization' AND shining a light of awareness on -the important- Turing/computation question that .. comes AFTER .. the Halting Problem: Self-organization .. which