At 04:41 PM 1/18/2005, you wrote:
It may be a freshman philosophy question, but it can't be a physics
question because you are dealing with issues occurring before our known
physics were established.
You really miss the point. It is a question of logic and finding an
unavoidable meaningful ques
It may be a freshman philosophy question, but it can't be a physics
question because you are dealing with issues occurring before our known
physics were established.
Hal Ruhl wrote:
At 02:37 PM 1/18/2005, you wrote:
I remember your previous posts on "nothing", and how it decays.
However, this co
At 02:37 PM 1/18/2005, you wrote:
I remember your previous posts on "nothing", and how it decays.
However, this concept requires an intelligence to be present with
"nothing" to cause nothingness to decay, does it not? It is intelligence
and consciousness which defines things and makes relative c
I remember your previous posts on "nothing", and how it decays.
However, this concept requires an intelligence to be present with
"nothing" to cause nothingness to decay, does it not? It is
intelligence and consciousness which defines things and makes relative
comparisons.
Danny Mayes
H
What I am really talking about is availability of choice.
My All/Nothing model appears to preclude choice. In this it seems a member
of a class that assume all information already exists.
Awhile ago I posted on another model in which there is a Nothing. This
Nothing suffers the same incomplete
5 matches
Mail list logo
