On 13/07/07, Brent Meeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brent, all that David is getting at is saying nothing reflexively
exists without being observed.
Observed in what sense? Consciously, by a conscious being? Or decoherred
into a quasi-classical state, as in QM? Reflexive would seem to
Brent Meeker skrev:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 09-juil.-07, 17:41, Torgny Tholerus a crit :
...
Our universe is the result of some set of rules. The interesting
thing is to discover the specific rules that span our universe.
Assuming comp, I don't
Le 12-juil.-07, à 18:43, Brent Meeker a écrit :
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 09-juil.-07, à 17:41, Torgny Tholerus a écrit :
...
Our universe is the result of some set of rules. The interesting
thing is to discover the specific rules that span our universe.
Assuming comp, I
Le 12-juil.-07, à 16:27, David Nyman a écrit :
On 12/07/07, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to avoid the words like reflexive or reflection in informal
talk, because it is a tricky technical terms
I tend to agree with what Brent said.
Yes, I ended up more or less agreeing
On 13/07/07, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I said in an earlier post that this amounted to a kind of solipsism of
the One: IOW, the One would be justified in the view (if it had one!)
that it was all that existed, and that everything was simply an aspect
of itself.
Yes, and
Le 13-juil.-07, à 17:02, David Nyman a écrit :
But since the One is not
what most people would consider a person (let alone a god), another
term would be better. I wonder what?
I think you are trying to give a name to what is unnameable (unless you
are not lobian; even lobian
On 13/07/07, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you are trying to give a name to what is unnameable (unless you
are not lobian; even lobian non-machine cannot name it).
Perish the thought. But I was referring to 'first person primacy',
not 'the One'. Maybe something like the
Torgny Tholerus wrote:
Brent Meeker skrev:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 09-juil.-07, à 17:41, Torgny Tholerus a écrit :
...
Our universe is the result of some set of rules. The interesting
thing is to discover the specific rules that span our universe.
Assuming comp, I
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 12-juil.-07, à 18:43, Brent Meeker a écrit :
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 09-juil.-07, à 17:41, Torgny Tholerus a écrit :
...
Our universe is the result of some set of rules. The interesting
thing is to discover the specific rules that span our universe.
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 12-juil.-07, à 16:27, David Nyman a écrit :
On 12/07/07, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to avoid the words like reflexive or reflection in informal
talk, because it is a tricky technical terms
I tend to agree with what Brent said.
Yes, I ended up
Apropos much discussion on this list, a new paper is available at
ftp://ftp.research.microsoft.com/pub/tr/TR-2007-85.pdf
Abstract:
The Abstract State Machine Thesis asserts that every classical
algorithm is behaviorally equivalent to an abstract state machine.
This thesis has been shown to follow
11 matches
Mail list logo
