Dear John,
Le 12-août-07, à 18:00, John Mikes a écrit :
Dear Bruno,
did your scientific emotion just trapped you into showing that your
theoretical setup makes no sense?
Angels have NO rational meaning, they are phantsms of a (fairy?)tale
and if your math-formulation can be applied to a
Le 12-août-07, à 18:00, John Mikes a écrit :
Please, do not tell me that your theories are as well applicable to
faith-items! Next time sopmebody will calculate the enthalpy of the
resurrection.
Frank Tipler calculated the probability of the resurrection in his last book
The Physics of
Just to clarify - my question to Bruno was serious. He has mentioned
angels before. I thank him for his considered response which I am
still studying.
The part of his post which prompted my question was:
Also, if we are machine (or just lobian), we can indeed contemplate the
consistency of
Le 13-août-07, à 13:29, Kim Jones a écrit :
where he appears to serve the option of being machine or some other
order of being. I must confess that I still don't understand the
ontology of angels as opposed to machines but I'm sure his reply
contains the reason
Don't worry, I will try
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Bruno Marchal
Skickat: den 13 augusti 2007 16:36
Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: Re: Rép : Observer Moment = Sigma1-Sentences
I don't think Church thesis can be grasped
conceptually without the
On 13/08/07, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question to David, and others who could be interested: is the notion
of enumerable and non enumerable set clear? Can you explain why the set
of functions from N to N is not enumerable?
Do please remind us. Off the top of my head, do you
On 11/08/07, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That the 'comp reality' is founded on the number realm, is almost
trivial. What is not trivial at all, and this is what the UDA shows, is
that, once you say yes to the digital doctor, for some level of
substitution, then your immateriality
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Question to David, and others who could be interested: is the notion
of enumerable and non enumerable set clear? Can you explain why the set
of functions from N to N is not enumerable?
Let us go slow and deep so that everybody can understand, once and for
8 matches
Mail list logo
