Re: What are the consequences of UD+ASSA?

On Oct 25, 3:25 am, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le 25-oct.-07, à 03:25, Wei Dai a écrit : > > > Rolf Nelson wrote: > >> An example > >> that Yudowsky gave: you might spend resources on constructing a unique > >> arrow pointing at yourself, in order to increase your measure by > >> m

Re: What are the consequences of UD+ASSA?

Rolf Nelson wrote: > Your observations to date are consistent with all three models. What > are the odds that you live in (2) but not (1) or (3)? Surely the > answer is "extremely high", but how do we justify it *mathematically* > (and philosophically)? My current position is, forget the "odds".

Re: What are the consequences of UD+ASSA?

Le 25-oct.-07, à 03:25, Wei Dai a écrit : > > Rolf Nelson wrote: >> 1. Provides a possible explanation for the "Measure Problem" of why we >> shouldn't be "extremely surprised" to find we live in a lawful >> universe, rather than an extremely chaotic universe, or a homogeneous >> cloud of gas. >

Re: Wolfram 2,3 Turing Machine

Le 24-oct.-07, à 20:32, Tom Caylor a écrit : > > This might be of interest to some of you, for instance Bruno, since > one of the ideals expounded here is "keep it simple". Sorry I haven't > been participating here. > >> From Wolfram Science Group: > > We're excited to announce that the $25,000